Literature DB >> 17416783

Induction of the phase 2 response in mouse and human skin by sulforaphane-containing broccoli sprout extracts.

Albena T Dinkova-Kostova1, Jed W Fahey, Kristina L Wade, Stephanie N Jenkins, Theresa A Shapiro, Edward J Fuchs, Michelle L Kerns, Paul Talalay.   

Abstract

The isothiocyanate sulforaphane was isolated from broccoli extracts in a bioactivity-guided fractionation as the principal and very potent inducer of cytoprotective phase 2 enzymes and subsequently shown to inhibit tumor development in animal models that involve various carcinogens and target organs. Because broccoli and broccoli sprouts are widely consumed, extracts obtained from them are viewed as convenient vehicles for sulforaphane delivery to humans. In relation to our current interest in devising strategies for protection against UV light-induced skin cancer, it was necessary to examine the safety and efficacy of topical application of sulforaphane-containing broccoli sprout extracts as single and multiple doses in both mice and humans. Topical application of an extract delivering 100 nmol sulforaphane/cm(2) increased the protein levels of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione S-transferase A1, and heme oxygenase 1, three representative phase 2 enzymes, in mouse skin epidermis. Quantitative assessment of the activity of NQO1 24 h after dosing showed increases of 1.5- and 2.7-fold after application of single and multiple (thrice, every 24 h) doses, respectively. A dose-escalation safety study in healthy human subjects revealed no adverse reactions when doses as high as 340 nmol of sulforaphane in the form of broccoli sprout extracts were applied topically to the center of a 1-cm-diameter circle drawn on the volar forearm. A subsequent efficacy study showed that despite the interindividual differences in basal levels, the enzyme activity of NQO1 in homogenates of 3-mm full thickness skin punch biopsies increased in a dose-dependent manner, with maximum increases of 1.5- and 4.5-fold after application of 150 nmol doses, once or three times (at 24 h-intervals), respectively, thus providing direct evidence for induction of the phase 2 response in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17416783     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  58 in total

Review 1.  Dietary Sulforaphane in Cancer Chemoprevention: The Role of Epigenetic Regulation and HDAC Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Screening for natural chemoprevention agents that modify human Keap1.

Authors:  Chenqi Hu; Dejan Nikolic; Aimee L Eggler; Andrew D Mesecar; Richard B van Breemen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 3.365

3.  Angelica sinensis and its alkylphthalides induce the detoxification enzyme NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 by alkylating Keap1.

Authors:  Birgit M Dietz; Dongting Liu; Ghenet K Hagos; Ping Yao; Andreas Schinkovitz; Samuel M Pro; Shixin Deng; Norman R Farnsworth; Guido F Pauli; Richard B van Breemen; Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Sensory neurons and schwann cells respond to oxidative stress by increasing antioxidant defense mechanisms.

Authors:  Andrea M Vincent; Koichi Kato; Lisa L McLean; Mary E Soules; Eva L Feldman
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.401

Review 5.  Molecular targets of dietary phenethyl isothiocyanate and sulforaphane for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Ka Lung Cheung; Ah-Ng Kong
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Characterization of the cancer chemopreventive NRF2-dependent gene battery in human keratinocytes: demonstration that the KEAP1-NRF2 pathway, and not the BACH1-NRF2 pathway, controls cytoprotection against electrophiles as well as redox-cycling compounds.

Authors:  A Kenneth MacLeod; Michael McMahon; Simon M Plummer; Larry G Higgins; Trevor M Penning; Kazuhiko Igarashi; John D Hayes
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Stability of sulforaphane for topical formulation.

Authors:  Stephen J Franklin; Sally E Dickinson; Kelly L Karlage; G T Bowden; Paul B Myrdal
Journal:  Drug Dev Ind Pharm       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Dietary chemoprevention strategies for induction of phase II xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in lung carcinogenesis: A review.

Authors:  Xiang-Lin Tan; Simon D Spivack
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Sulforaphane mobilizes cellular defenses that protect skin against damage by UV radiation.

Authors:  Paul Talalay; Jed W Fahey; Zachary R Healy; Scott L Wehage; Andrea L Benedict; Christine Min; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Selenium enrichment of broccoli sprout extract increases chemosensitivity and apoptosis of LNCaP prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Rizky Abdulah; Ahmad Faried; Kenji Kobayashi; Chiho Yamazaki; Eka W Suradji; Kazuto Ito; Kazuhiro Suzuki; Masami Murakami; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Hiroshi Koyama
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.