Literature DB >> 17415768

Host response to sponge implants differs between subcutaneous and intraperitoneal sites in mice.

Juliana B Mendes1, Paula P Campos, Mônica A N D Ferreira, Y S Bakhle, Silvia P Andrade.   

Abstract

Synthetic matrices have been used widely to repair and/or to replace biological tissues. However, there is relatively little information on the effect of different anatomical compartments on the host response to foreign implants. We have analyzed such responses to sponge implants in subcutaneous and in intraperitoneal sites in mice at days 3, 5, and 8 postimplantation by measuring inflammation, angiogenesis, and production of proangiogenic/inflammatory cytokines. The angiogenic response, assessed by hemoglobin content and by morphometric analysis of the number of vessels, was higher in intraperitoneal implants. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in intraperitoneal implants were 14-fold higher than in subcutaneous implants at day 3 and remained high for the next 5 days. Neutrophil accumulation as determined by myeloperoxidase activity was the same in both types of implants. Macrophage accumulation (N-acetylglucosaminidase activity) was also similar on days 3 and 8 in both implants. Levels of the chemokine CXCL2/KC were always higher, but those of CCL2/JE lower, in the intraperitoneal implant. These results demonstrate that the anatomical site of the implant markedly influenced the host response to synthetic matrices. Our results provide a greater understanding of factors affecting the biocompatibility of exogenous materials placed at different anatomical sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17415768     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  13 in total

1.  Lack of TNF-α-induced MMP-9 production and abnormal E-cadherin redistribution associated with compromised fusion in MCP-1-null macrophages.

Authors:  Eleni A Skokos; Antonios Charokopos; Khadija Khan; Jackie Wanjala; Themis R Kyriakides
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  Effects of age-related shifts in cellular function and local microenvironment upon the innate immune response to implants.

Authors:  Bryan N Brown; Martin J Haschak; Samuel T Lopresti; Elizabeth C Stahl
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 11.130

3.  Distinct macrophage populations and phenotypes associated with IL-4 mediated immunomodulation at the host implant interface.

Authors:  Daniel Hachim; Samuel T LoPresti; Rahul D Rege; Yuta Umeda; Aimon Iftikhar; Alexis L Nolfi; Clint D Skillen; Bryan N Brown
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 6.843

4.  The pivotal role of fibrocytes and mast cells in mediating fibrotic reactions to biomaterials.

Authors:  Paul T Thevenot; David W Baker; Hong Weng; Man-Wu Sun; Liping Tang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Effects of aging upon the host response to implants.

Authors:  Daniel Hachim; Na Wang; Samuel T Lopresti; Elizabeth C Stahl; Yuta U Umeda; Rahul D Rege; Sean T Carey; Deepa Mani; Bryan N Brown
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.396

6.  In Vitro and In Vivo Models for Assessing the Host Response to Biomaterials.

Authors:  Leila S Saleh; Stephanie J Bryant
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Models       Date:  2018-05-18

7.  Fibrin polymer on the surface of biomaterial implants drives the foreign body reaction.

Authors:  Arnat Balabiyev; Nataly P Podolnikova; Jacquelyn A Kilbourne; D Page Baluch; David Lowry; Azadeh Zare; Robert Ros; Matthew J Flick; Tatiana P Ugarova
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 15.304

8.  Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet (PF-4) factor 4 inputs modulate human microvascular endothelial signaling in a three-dimensional matrix migration context.

Authors:  Ta-Chun Hang; Nathan C Tedford; Raven J Reddy; Tharathorn Rimchala; Alan Wells; Forest M White; Roger D Kamm; Douglas A Lauffenburger
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Foreign body response to subcutaneous implants in diabetic rats.

Authors:  Teresa Oviedo Socarrás; Anilton C Vasconcelos; Paula P Campos; Nubia B Pereira; Jessica P C Souza; Silvia P Andrade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Brazilian green propolis modulates inflammation, angiogenesis and fibrogenesis in intraperitoneal implant in mice.

Authors:  Luiza D C Lima; Silvia P Andrade; Paula P Campos; Lucíola S Barcelos; Frederico M Soriani; Sandra A L Moura; Mônica A N D Ferreira
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 3.659

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.