Literature DB >> 17415580

Bone anchored hearing aids: a second fixture reduces auditory deprivation in Cambridge.

V S P Durvasula1, H Patel, S Mahendran, R F Gray.   

Abstract

Bone anchored hearing aids are well established for canal atresia, otosclerosis and chronic suppurative otitis media. Refinements in technique to maximise gain while keeping the complications to a minimum are desirable. This study was taken up in order to explore the potential advantage of a second or spare fixture placed at the time of primary surgery. A group of patients who underwent BAHA insertion at The Emmeline Centre for Cochlear Implants and Bone Anchored Hearing Aids, Addenbrookes hospital, Cambridge, UK with the placement of a spare fixture between 1999 and 2002 were compared to those patients with one fixture BAHA undertaken from 1991. Main outcome measures were complications encountered and duration of disability, (i.e. loss of hearing while waiting for new fixture placement). Both groups had similar incidence of complications, but the group with two fixtures suffered a shorter period of disability when a fixture failed. In our experience the use of second or spare fixture reduces the duration of disability. It engenders no additional complications with minimal extra cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17415580     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0292-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: with particular emphasis on complications.

Authors:  Hisham Zeitoun; Ranit De; Stuart D Thompson; David W Proops
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.469

2.  Surgical experience with bone-anchored hearing aids in children.

Authors:  B C Papsin; T K Sirimanna; D M Albert; C M Bailey
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  The safety and effectiveness of an implanted electromagnetic hearing device.

Authors:  G A Gates; J V Hough; W M Gatti; W H Bradley
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1989-08

4.  Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

Authors:  P I Brånemark; B O Hansson; R Adell; U Breine; J Lindström; O Hallén; A Ohman
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl       Date:  1977

5.  One-stage procedure to establish osseointegration: a zero to five years follow-up report.

Authors:  A Tjellström; G Granström
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.469

6.  Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: the initial Birmingham experience.

Authors:  D S Stevenson; D W Proops; M J Wake; M J Deadman; S J Worrollo; J A Hobson
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids.

Authors:  A Tjellström; J Lindström; O Hallén; T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1981-04

8.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw.

Authors:  R Adell; U Lekholm; B Rockler; P I Brånemark
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1981-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.