Literature DB >> 17415541

[Form stability after ear correction using the anterior scoring technique: a prospective study to compare anterior and the posterior approaches].

Y Yildirim1, H Fischer, W Gubisch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Protruding ears are usually caused by an overdeveloped concha and the lack of an anthelical fold. To reconstruct this fold, we applied the open anterior cartilage scoring technique. There are two different approaches for this technique, anterior access or posterior access. We have used the latter for years. After finding some minor partial relapses, we started a prospective study to compare the objective results of both techniques. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: Forty patients underwent surgery (20 with anterior access and 20 with posterior access). The position of the ear to the head, which was defined by several standardized points of the ear (distance between the helical rim and the mastoid), was measured preoperatively, 3 weeks postoperatively after removing the anchoring splint sutures, and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The differences between the measurements in the third week and third month show postoperative stability.
CONCLUSIONS: We could achieve the same stability using both techniques, but obtained more symmetrical results with posterior access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17415541     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-006-1508-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  22 in total

1.  Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases.

Authors:  S L Jeffery
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1999-10

2.  A METHOD OF ANTIHELIX RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  V CHONGCHET
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1963-07

3.  Correction of protruding ears: A 20-year retrospective.

Authors:  D C Baker; J M Converse
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  Otoplasty goals and principles.

Authors:  W K Wright
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-12

5.  Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures.

Authors:  D W Furnas
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears.

Authors:  A J McDowell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  [Correction of prominent ears (author's transl)].

Authors:  O Staindl
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  [Results of otoplasty (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Martin
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results.

Authors:  P A Adamson; B L McGraw; G J Tropper
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Mustardé's otoplasty--evaluation of correlation between clinical and statistical findings.

Authors:  A Minderjahn; W R Hüttl; H Hildmann
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1980-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.