Literature DB >> 17415123

Practice patterns, safety, and rationale for tracheostomy tube changes: a survey of otolaryngology training programs.

Abtin Tabaee1, Tali Lando, Scott Rickert, Michael G Stewart, William I Kuhel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Tracheotomy for long-term ventilation is a common surgical procedure in the hospital setting. Although the postoperative care is often perceived as routine, complications associated with tracheostomy changes may result in loss of airway and death. In addition, the practice patterns, rationale, and complications related to tube changes have been poorly described. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A survey of chief residents in accredited otolaryngology training programs was performed to determine the management strategies, rationale, and complications associated with postoperative tracheostomy tube changes.
RESULTS: The first tube change was performed after a mean of 5.3 (range, 3-7) days after the procedure, most frequently by junior residents. The first change was performed in a variety of locations including the intensive care unit (88%), step down unit (80%), and regular floor (78%). Twenty-five percent performed these changes at night or on weekends. The most frequently reported rationale for performing routine tracheotomy changes was examination of the stoma for maturity (46%), prevention of stomal infection (46%), and confirmation of stability for transport to a less monitored setting (41%). Twenty-five (42%) respondents reported awareness of a loss of airway, and nine (15%) respondents reported awareness of a death as a result of the first tube change at their institution during their residency. A statistically significant higher incidence of airway loss was reported by respondents who reported performing the first tube change on the floor (96.1% vs. 63.6%).
CONCLUSION: There is significant variability in the approach to postoperative tracheostomy tube management. The occurrence of major complications including deaths from routine tube changes requires an examination of the rationale and safety of this practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17415123     DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318030455a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Open tracheostomy training: a nationwide survey among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery residents.

Authors:  Limor Muallem-Kalmovich; Jacob Pitaro; Ayman Asaly; Alex Kessler; Ephraim Eviatar; Moran Shteiner; Tal Marom
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  To Be Cautious or Not: Tension Pneumothorax After First Tracheostomy Tube Exchange.

Authors:  Ankur Luthra; Rajeev Chauhan; Pranshuta Sabarwal; Asish Kumar Sahoo
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 3.  Guidelines for Tracheostomy From the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society.

Authors:  Inn-Chul Nam; Yoo Seob Shin; Woo-Jin Jeong; Min Woo Park; Seong Yong Park; Chang Myeon Song; Young Chan Lee; Jae Hyun Jeon; Jongmin Lee; Chang Hyun Kang; Il-Seok Park; Kwhanmien Kim; Dong Il Sun
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.372

4.  Life-threatening tension pneumothorax after unsuccessful tracheostomy tube exchange in a trauma patient - A case report.

Authors:  Min A Kwon; Chaemin Cho; Jeong Heon Park
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2020-01-31

5.  Quality tracheotomy care can be maintained for non-COVID patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jacqueline Tucker; Nicole Ruszkay; Neerav Goyal; John P Gniady; David Goldenberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 6.  Tracheotomy in the intensive care unit: guidelines from a French expert panel.

Authors:  Jean Louis Trouillet; Olivier Collange; Fouad Belafia; François Blot; Gilles Capellier; Eric Cesareo; Jean-Michel Constantin; Alexandre Demoule; Jean-Luc Diehl; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot; Franck Jegoux; Erwan L'Her; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Yazine Mahjoub; Julien Mayaux; Hervé Quintard; François Ravat; Sebastien Vergez; Julien Amour; Max Guillot
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 6.925

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.