Literature DB >> 17414714

Diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection by analyzing whole blood mRNA expression of lymphocyte marker molecules.

Noora S Alakulppi1, Lauri E Kyllönen, Jukka Partanen, Kaija T Salmela, Jarmo T Laine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, the diagnosis of acute rejection after kidney transplantation is based on a kidney biopsy taken after clinical rejection suspicion. A robust, noninvasive diagnostic method would allow easier and more frequent monitoring of the patient and the graft. Potentially, a straightforward method would be the analysis of lymphocyte marker molecule expression from whole blood samples.
METHODS: Whole blood samples were collected prospectively in a single kidney transplantation center from 50 adult kidney recipients transplanted between 2001 and 2005. The mRNA expression of granzyme B, perforin, FasL, granulysin, CD154, ICOS, CTLA4 and PD-1 were analyzed with real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: The expression of ICOS and CD154 were significantly lower in rejection patients than in control patients (P<0.001). Both genes gave statistically significant area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC; 0.87, 0.88) with 84% sensitivity and 100% specificity for CD154 and 76% and 86% for ICOS, respectively. In paired rejection and postrejection therapy samples, the expression of both genes significantly increased during rejection therapy (P<0.001). When rejection patients were compared to patients biopsied because of other reasons of graft dysfunction, both CD154 and ICOS were lower in rejection patients but only CD154 was statistically significant (P=0.028, AUC=0.740, sensitivity 52%, specificity 90%). The other studied genes gave no consistent statistically significant results.
CONCLUSIONS: The whole blood gene expression quantities of costimulatory molecules CD154 and ICOS reasonably robustly differentiated rejection patients from control patients. The clinical use of the analysis is limited by poor capability to differentiate patients with rejection from patients with other causes of graft dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414714     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000258726.13363.ab

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  A 'biomarker signature' for tolerance in transplantation.

Authors:  Maria P Hernandez-Fuentes; Robert I Lechler
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  Advances in diagnostics for transplant rejection.

Authors:  Michael Nasr; Tara Sigdel; Minnie Sarwal
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.225

3.  CD28 family and chronic rejection: "to belatacept...And beyond!".

Authors:  Marcos V Silva; Juliana R Machado; Laura P Rocha; Lúcio R Castellano; Marlene A Reis; Rosana R M Corrêa
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-06-07

4.  Association of FAS -670A/G and FASL -843C/T Gene Polymorphisms on Allograft Nephropathy in Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Pelin Ertan; Sevgi Mir; Nese Ozkayin; Afig Berdeli
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.364

5.  Biomarkers in solid organ transplantation: establishing personalized transplantation medicine.

Authors:  Silke Roedder; Matthew Vitalone; Purvesh Khatri; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 11.117

6.  White blood cell differentials enrich whole blood expression data in the context of acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Authors:  Casey P Shannon; Zsuzsanna Hollander; Janet Wilson-McManus; Robert Balshaw; Raymond T Ng; Robert McMaster; Bruce M McManus; Paul A Keown; Scott J Tebbutt
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2012-04-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.