Literature DB >> 17414478

Generalizability of the sensory organization test in college-aged males: obtaining a reliable performance measure.

D Clark Dickin1, Sean Clark.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study used generalizability theory to (1) determine the reliability of the six Sensory Organization Test (SOT) conditions, and (2) to determine the most effective testing schedule to obtain reliable posture measurements.
DESIGN: Generalizability theory was used to determine the most effecting testing protocol to obtain reliable assessments of postural sway in various sensory environments. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five recreationally active college-aged males.
SETTING: University research laboratory.
INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Postural stability as measured by equilibrium score (a percentage measure indicating amount of sway, with lower scores indicating a greater amount of postural sway). Scores were obtained for each of the six sensory conditions across multiple trials, tests, and days.
RESULTS: This study showed that performing the SOT twice on a single testing day was sufficient to achieve moderate to good reliability across the six conditions of the SOT. Extending SOT testing to twice on 2 days yielded good to excellent reliability estimates across all SOT conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results indicate that for the purpose of monitoring changes in the postural control system, an individual needs to experience the full complement of SOT testing conditions at least twice. However, if highly reliable baseline measures of SOT performance are necessary, multiple tests performed on multiple days are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414478     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31803bf647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  8 in total

1.  Normative Data for the NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test in US Military Special Operations Forces.

Authors:  Erin R Pletcher; Valerie J Williams; John P Abt; Paul M Morgan; Jeffrey J Parr; Meleesa F Wohleber; Mita Lovalekar; Timothy C Sell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Are divided attention tasks useful in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion?

Authors:  Johna K Register-Mihalik; Ashley C Littleton; Kevin M Guskiewicz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  A comparison of accelerometry and center of pressure measures during computerized dynamic posturography: a measure of balance.

Authors:  S L Whitney; J L Roche; G F Marchetti; C-C Lin; D P Steed; G R Furman; M C Musolino; M S Redfern
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  The Mulligan ankle taping does not affect balance performance in healthy subjects: a prospective, randomized blinded trial.

Authors:  Jose Maria Delfa de-la-Morena; Isabel Maria Alguacil-Diego; Francisco Molina-Rueda; Maria Ramiro-González; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Josué Fernández-Carnero
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-05-26

5.  Therapeutic patient education and exercise therapy in patients with cervicogenic dizziness: a prospective case series clinical study.

Authors:  Ana Minguez-Zuazo; Mónica Grande-Alonso; Beatriz Moral Saiz; Roy La Touche; Sergio Lerma Lara
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-30

6.  Test-retest reliability of static postural control in people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Maria Mercedes Reguera-García; Fernanda de Souza-Teixeira; Jose Antonio de Paz Fernández
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-08-10

7.  Normative Data for the NeuroCom Sensory Organization Test in United States Military Academy Boxers.

Authors:  Nathan E Henry; Amy N Weart; Erin M Miller; Lisa D Feltner; Donald L Goss
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Assessing postural stability in the concussed athlete: what to do, what to expect, and when.

Authors:  Alexander Ruhe; René Fejer; Axel Gänsslen; Wolfgang Klein
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.843

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.