Literature DB >> 17414283

Postoperative anti-Tgf-beta2 antibody therapy improves intracranial volume and craniofacial growth in craniosynostotic rabbits.

Mark P Mooney1, H Wolfgang Losken, Amr M Moursi, Jocelyn M Shand, Gregory M Cooper, Chris Curry, Lillian Ho, Anne M Burrows, Eric J Stelnicki, Joseph E Losee, Lynne A Opperman, Michael I Siegel.   

Abstract

Postoperative resynostosis and secondary craniofacial growth abnormalities are common sequelae after craniofacial surgery. It has been suggested that an overexpression of transforming growth factor-beta2 (Tgf-beta2) may be related to craniosynostosis and contribute to postoperative resynostosis. Interference with Tgf-beta2 function using neutralizing antibodies may inhibit resynostosis and improve postoperative craniofacial growth; the present study was designed to test this hypothesis. Twenty-nine New Zealand white rabbits with bilateral coronal suture synostosis were used: 1) suturectomy controls (n=9); 2) suturectomy with nonspecific, control IgG antibody (n=9); and 3) suturectomy with anti-Tgf-beta2 antibody (n=11). At 10 days of age, a 3 mm x 15-mm coronal suturectomy was performed. The sites in groups 2 and 3 were immediately filled with 0.1 cc of a slow resorbing collagen gel mixed with either IgG (100 microg/suture) or anti-Tgf-beta2 (100 microg/suture). Three-dimensional computed tomography scan reconstructions of the skulls and cephalographs were obtained at 10, 25, 42, and 84 days of age. Computed tomography scan data revealed patent suturectomy sites and significantly (P<0.05) greater intracranial volumes by 84 days of age in rabbits treated with anti-Tgf-beta2 compared with controls. Cephalometric analysis revealed significant (P<0.05) differences in craniofacial, cranial vault, and cranial base growth by 84 days of age in rabbits treated with anti-Tgf-beta2 compared with controls. These data support the initial hypothesis that interference with Tgf-beta2 function inhibited postoperative resynostosis and improved cranial vault growth in this rabbit model. Thus, this biologically based therapy may be a potential surgical adjunct in the treatment of infants with craniosynostosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414283     DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3180336047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

Review 1.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Greg Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  The influence of surgical correction on white matter microstructural integrity in rabbits with familial coronal suture craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Christopher M Bonfield; Lesley M Foley; Shinjini Kundu; Wendy Fellows-Mayle; T Kevin Hitchens; Gustavo K Rohde; Ramesh Grandhi; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Comparison of craniofacial phenotype in craniosynostotic rabbits treated with anti-Tgf-beta2 at suturectomy site.

Authors:  Brenda C Frazier; Mark P Mooney; H Wolfgang Losken; Tim Barbano; Amr Moursi; Michael I Siegel; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-12-31

Review 4.  Models of cranial suture biology.

Authors:  Monica Grova; David D Lo; Daniel Montoro; Jeong S Hyun; Michael T Chung; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  The influence of suturectomy on age-related changes in cerebral blood flow in rabbits with familial bicoronal suture craniosynostosis: A quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Ramesh Grandhi; Geoffrey W Peitz; Lesley M Foley; Christopher M Bonfield; Wendy Fellows-Mayle; T Kevin Hitchens; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  The clinical manifestations, molecular mechanisms and treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Eloise Stanton; Mark Urata; Jian-Fu Chen; Yang Chai
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 5.732

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.