Literature DB >> 17414199

In-depth learning: one school's initiatives to foster integration of ethics, values, and the human dimensions of medicine.

Steven L Kanter1, Paul F Wimmers, Arthur S Levine.   

Abstract

Today's medical student curriculum is a lock-step experience that provides a broad survey of medicine with little opportunity to pursue fully integrated, in-depth learning. To teach students about the human dimensions of health care, many schools simply have added courses that survey general areas such as ethics, values, and patient-doctor relationships. However, a superficial, broad-brush approach does not offer students sufficient opportunity to engage with these topics in substantive and meaningful ways. The authors propose that a theme-based, individualized, in-depth learning experience (in which students pursue a focused project comprehensively and in detail)--one that is an integral part of the curriculum--helps students learn to blend values and ethics with medicine in a way that cannot occur during rapid-paced topical survey courses. Furthermore, it is in the depths of a learning experience that one comes face to face with the realities of uncertainty: the realization that unanswerable questions outnumber answerable ones; the awareness of the difficulty in accumulating sufficient evidence to answer a question that is, in fact, answerable; the recognition that many patients' problems transcend available evidence and must be addressed by the art of medicine; the realization that a patient can have a condition that one cannot diagnose and that may even get better for reasons that one cannot understand. The authors describe three initiatives at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, two of which have been offered for more than 10 years, that illustrate the value of in-depth learning experiences. These in-depth experiences blend situated learning, reflective exercises, faculty mentoring, critical reading of literature, and constructive feedback in a prescribed but individualized curriculum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414199     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318033373c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  The morning report: how do faculty members perceive medical educational needs?

Authors:  Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 2.  [Medical ethics teaching].

Authors:  Alena M Buyx; Bruce Maxwell; Holger Supper; Bettina Schöne-Seifert
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Time for a unified approach to medical ethics.

Authors:  Shaheen E Lakhan; Elissa Hamlat; Turi McNamee; Cyndi Laird
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 2.464

Review 4.  Mentoring programs for medical students--a review of the PubMed literature 2000-2008.

Authors:  Esther Frei; Martina Stamm; Barbara Buddeberg-Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Daniel Zhihao Hong; Jia Ling Goh; Zhi Yang Ong; Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting; Mun Kit Wong; Jiaxuan Wu; Xiu Hui Tan; Rachelle Qi En Toh; Christine Li Ling Chiang; Caleb Wei Hao Ng; Jared Chuan Kai Ng; Yun Ting Ong; Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong; Kuang Teck Tay; Laura Hui Shuen Tan; Gillian Li Gek Phua; Warren Fong; Limin Wijaya; Shirlyn Hui Shan Neo; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Min Chiam; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  The medical students' perspective of faculty and informal mentors: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Jay J H Park; Paul Adamiak; Deirdre Jenkins; Doug Myhre
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.