Literature DB >> 17414195

A curricular model for the training of physician scientists: the evolution of the Duke University School of Medicine curriculum.

Colleen O'Connor Grochowski1, Edward Charles Halperin, Edward George Buckley.   

Abstract

Duke University School of Medicine offers an unusual doctor of medicine educational program. The core basic sciences are taught in year one, core clinical clerkships are completed in the second year, the entire third year is devoted to scholarly investigation, and elective rotations are fulfilled in the fourth year. The creation of this unique structure presented many challenges and is the product of a desire of key faculty 40 years ago to change radically the way medical education was taught. Over the years, improvements have been made, but the underlying principles of these visionary leaders have been retained: inquire not just acquire, flexibility of choice, and in-depth exploration. In the spirit of innovation that was established 40 years ago, leaders and faculty at Duke developed a new curricular model in 2004, called Foundation for Excellence, which is anchored in integrated, interdisciplinary innovation. The authors describe the process of curricular reform and provide a detailed overview of this unique approach to medical education. In keeping with Duke's mission to graduate clinician-researchers and clinician-educators, reducing the basic science curriculum to one year created a year saved, which students are now required to devote to scholarly pursuits. The authors argue that adopting a similar one-year basic science curriculum would make instructional time available for other schools to achieve their own institutional goals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17414195     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180333575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  8 in total

1.  Medical student research at the John A. Burns School of Medicine (JABSOM): the Research Interest Group.

Authors:  Thomas Sanford; Zackary Chancer; Krista Kiyosaki
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2010-07

Review 2.  Trends in study methods used in undergraduate medical education research, 1969-2007.

Authors:  Amy Baernstein; Hillary K Liss; Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Anatomy as the backbone of an integrated first year medical curriculum: design and implementation.

Authors:  Brenda J Klement; Douglas F Paulsen; Lawrence E Wineski
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Determining Expected Research Skills of Medical Students on Graduation: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Melissa G Y Lee; Wendy C Y Hu; Justin L C Bilszta
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Training and assessing undergraduate medical students' research: Learning, engagement and experiences of students and staff.

Authors:  Saajida Mahomed; Andrew Ross; Jacqueline Van Wyk
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2021-01-15

6.  Pre-clinical remote undergraduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study.

Authors:  Bita Shahrvini; Sally L Baxter; Charles S Coffey; Bridget V MacDonald; Lina Lander
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Medical Students' Confidence in Their Abilities and Barriers to Conducting Research: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Robin J Jacobs; Joshua Caballero; Michael N Kane
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-03

8.  The Merits and Challenges of Three-Year Medical School Curricula: Time for an Evidence-Based Discussion.

Authors:  John R Raymond; Joseph E Kerschner; William J Hueston; Cheryl A Maurana
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 6.893

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.