Literature DB >> 17413888

A comparative study of maxillary growth following rotation-advancement and triangular flap unilateral cleft lip repairs: an experimental study in rabbits.

Tian Meng1, Bing Shi, Qing Wang, Qian Zheng, Min Wu, Lei Huang, Jie Long, Sheng Li, Yan Wang, Bei Li.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate 2 features of maxillary growth following Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison triangular flap cleft lip repairs in rabbits with surgically created defects simulating unilateral cleft lip and cleft alveolus. Sixty purebred New Zealand rabbits were used in this experiment. The animals were divided into 4 groups: 2 control groups (unoperated and unrepaired) and 2 experimental groups (lip repair with rotation-advancement and lip repair with triangular flap). Nineteen metric cranial variables were measured directly from the cleaned skulls. Direct cephalometric measurements were taken in the following dimensions: maxillary length, width and height, posterior facial width, and nasal deflection. Significant differences were noted between Millard rotation-advancement group and Tennison triangular flap group in 2 of 6 measurements of maxillary length. Analysis of variance revealed significantly statistical differences between Millard rotation-advancement group and Tennison triangular flap group in 3 of 6 measures of maxillary width. Analysis of variance revealed no significantly statistical differences between Millard rotation-advancement group and Tennison triangular flap group in maxillary height. Statistical differences were noted between Millard rotation-advancement group and Tennison triangular flap group in posterior facial width. There was no significantly statistical difference between Millard rotation-advancement group and Tennison triangular flap group for the nasal deflection measurements. The results of this study indicated that the features of maxillary growth were different between the 2 lip-repair techniques in rabbits with surgically created defects simulating unilateral cleft lip and alveolus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413888     DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000237645.58470.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  A Novel Animal Model for Simulating Scarring After Cleft Lip Repair.

Authors:  Evangelos Papathanasiou; Carroll Ann Trotman; Corinna Beale; Thomas E Van Dyke; Andrew R Scott
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med       Date:  2021-02-24

2.  The perioral muscle continuum affects premaxillary development in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Weiwei Bian; Rao Fu; Jing Wang; Jian Wang; Jia Zhou
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Cleft lip - a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Mahdi A Shkoukani; Michael Chen; Angela Vong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 4.  The impact of cleft lip and palate repair on maxillofacial growth.

Authors:  Bing Shi; Joseph E Losee
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 6.344

5.  Effect of Relaxing Incisions on the Maxillary Growth after Primary Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair in Mild and Moderate Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry; Omar Cotrina-Rabanal; Olga Figallo-Hudtwalcker; Alicia Gonzalez-Vereau
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-01-16

6.  A new congenital cleft palate New Zealand rabbit model for surgical research.

Authors:  Haoyue Liu; Lingling Pu; Chialing Tsauo; Xiaoming Wang; Qian Zheng; Bing Shi; Chenghao Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.