Literature DB >> 17413772

Reluctance to care: a systematic review and development of a conceptual framework.

Letitia Burridge1, Sarah Winch, Alexandra Clavarino.   

Abstract

Primary lay carers are increasingly important in the care of patients with cancer, but their role can be complex and extended. Potential carers may feel anything from highly committed to not at all interested in caregiving, but powerful social norms pressure them to accept the role, and reluctance may be hidden to avoid censure. The purpose of this review was to gain insights into caregiving reluctance and its consequences. The findings were organized into 4 major dimensions: demographic, physical, psychological, and social. Three major outcomes were identified: deterioration in the carer-patient relationship, reduced quality of care, and institutionalization. Definitive answers to the review questions remain elusive. Choice seems to be a major indicator of caregiving reluctance, although reluctance may not remain static over the caregiving trajectory. Caregiving reluctance remains an underexplored topic, particularly in the context of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413772     DOI: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000265298.17394.e0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  10 in total

Review 1.  The role of the Internet in supporting and informing carers of people with cancer: a literature review.

Authors:  Nicole A Kinnane; Donna J Milne
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Cancer-Related Debt and Mental-Health-Related Quality of Life among Rural Cancer Survivors: Do Family/Friend Informal Caregiver Networks Moderate the Relationship?

Authors:  Emily Hallgren; Theresa A Hastert; Leslie R Carnahan; Jan M Eberth; Scherezade K Mama; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Lack of choice in caregiving decision and caregiver risk of stress, North Carolina, 2005.

Authors:  Katherine H Winter; Erin D Bouldin; Elena M Andresen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Caregiving and chronic care: the guided care program for families and friends.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Erin Rand-Giovannetti; Sara Palmer; Stephen Wegener; Lisa Reider; Katherine Frey; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Caregiving Choice and Emotional Stress Among Cancer Caregivers.

Authors:  Margaret L Longacre; Eric A Ross; Carolyn Y Fang
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  How family carers engage with technical health procedures in the home: a grounded theory study.

Authors:  Janet McDonald; Eileen McKinlay; Sally Keeling; William Levack
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an outcall program to reduce carer burden and depression among carers of cancer patients [PROTECT]: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Patricia M Livingston; Richard H Osborne; Mari Botti; Cathy Mihalopoulos; Sean McGuigan; Leila Heckel; Kate Gunn; Jacquie Chirgwin; David M Ashley; Melinda Williams
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  How Culture Shapes Informal Caregiver Motivations: A Meta-Ethnographic Review.

Authors:  Mikołaj Zarzycki; Diane Seddon; Eva Bei; Rachel Dekel; Val Morrison
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2022-06-23

9.  Reconciling employment with caring for a husband with an advanced illness.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Getting back or giving back: understanding caregiver motivations and willingness to provide informal care.

Authors:  Mikołaj Zarzycki; Val Morrison
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2021-07-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.