Literature DB >> 17413293

Risk factors for delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage in patients with gastric tumor.

Jae Woo Kim1, Hyun Soo Kim, Dong Hoon Park, Yong Soon Park, Myeong Gwan Jee, Soon Koo Baik, Sang Ok Kwon, Dong Ki Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although endoscopic mucosal resection has been recognized as the standard treatment for gastric mucosal neoplasm, postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage remains a major complication of endoscopic mucosal resection, and this problem seems to be increasing owing to the development of invasive techniques. The aims of this study were to determine the incidence and grade of postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage and to identify risk factors for delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage in patients with gastric neoplasm.
METHODS: Data of endoscopic mucosal resections performed by three endoscopists were retrospectively collected over 8 years and then analyzed. Immediate postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage was defined as bleeding during the procedure. Delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage was defined when two of the four following parameters were satisfied after the endoscopic mucosal resection period; (i) hematemesis, melena or dizziness, (ii) hemoglobin loss >2 g/dl, (iii) blood pressure decrease >20 mmHg or pulse rate increase >20/min and (iv) Forrest I or IIa-IIb on follow-up endoscopy.
RESULTS: A total of 157 patients (mean age: 64 years, male : female=44 : 113) were reviewed. Twenty-nine (18.5%) and 13 patients (8.3%) presented with immediate and delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the patient's age (<or=65 years; odds ratio 6.11, 95% confidence interval 1.12-33.43), the size of lesion (>15 mm; odds ratio 5.90, 95% confidence interval 1.13-30.87) and the experience of the endoscopist (<or=5 years; odds ratio 16.31, 95% confidence interval 1.46-181.97) were significantly predictive variables for the delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION: Considering the higher risk of delayed postendoscopic mucosal resection hemorrhage, careful preparation and close monitoring are required for patients who are less than 65 years, have large lesions over 15 mm or if the procedures were performed by an inexperienced endoscopist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413293     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32801015be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in patients with comorbid diseases.

Authors:  Beom Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Chang; Jae J Kim; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Hee Jung Son; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jong Chul Rhee; Kyung Mee Kim; Chul Keun Park
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.519

2.  Risk factors and correlations of immediate, early delayed, and late delayed bleeding associated with endoscopic resection for gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  So-Eun Park; Do Hoon Kim; Hwoon-Yong Jung; Hyun Lim; Ji Yong Ahn; Kwi-Sook Choi; Jeong Hoon Lee; Kee Don Choi; Ho June Song; Gin Hyug Lee; Jin-Ho Kim; Seungbong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Prediction of intraoperative bleeding during endoscopic treatment in patients with early gastric cancers: utility of contrast-enhanced MDCT gastrography and the wall-carving image technique.

Authors:  Daisuke Tsurumaru; Satoshi Kawanami; Masahiro Komori; Kiyohisa Hiraka; Yoshiki Asayama; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Predictors of immediate bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric lesions.

Authors:  Seong Woo Jeon; Min Kyu Jung; Chang Min Cho; Won Young Tak; Young Oh Kweon; Sung Kook Kim; Yong Hwan Choi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is the Reinitiation of Antiplatelet Agents Safe at 1 Week after Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection? Assessment of Bleeding Risk Using the Forrest Classification.

Authors:  Jong Yeul Lee; Chan Gyoo Kim; Soo-Jeong Cho; Young-Il Kim; Il Ju Choi
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.519

6.  Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Treatment of Solitary Gastric Neurofibroma.

Authors:  Meihong Yu; Kaixuan Li; Deliang Liu; Yuyong Tan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-01-06

7.  Utility of a deep learning model and a clinical model for predicting bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ji Eun Na; Yeong Chan Lee; Tae Jun Kim; Hyuk Lee; Hong-Hee Won; Yang Won Min; Byung-Hoon Min; Jun Haeng Lee; Poong-Lyul Rhee; Jae J Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.374

8.  Clinical impact of second-look endoscopy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplasms.

Authors:  Hyung Hun Kim; Seun Ja Park; Moo In Park; Won Moon
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  The need for second-look endoscopy to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jong Sun Kim; Min Woo Chung; Cho Yun Chung; Hyung Chul Park; Dae Yeul Ryang; Dae Seong Myung; Sung Bum Cho; Wan Sik Lee; Young Eun Joo
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Endoscopic Submucosal Tunnel Dissection for Large Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: A Case-Matched Controlled Study.

Authors:  Xiuxue Feng; Enqiang Linghu; Ningli Chai; Zhongsheng Lu; Xiangdong Wang; Ping Tang; Jiangyun Meng; Hong Du; Hongbin Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 2.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.