Literature DB >> 17413283

Who benefits from nutritional support: what is the evidence?

Rebecca J Stratton1, Marinos Elia.   

Abstract

Nutritional support, including oral nutritional supplements, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition, can be an important part of the management of any patient. Malnutrition is common and costly, clinically and financially, if left untreated. In patients with, or at risk of, malnutrition, the appropriate use of nutritional support can prevent complications arising, produce other clinical, functional and financial benefits, and can be life saving in some situations. This article discusses the evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effectiveness of nutritional support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413283     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e32801055c0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  18 in total

Review 1.  The view of European experts regarding health economics for medical nutrition in disease-related malnutrition.

Authors:  K Freijer; I Lenoir-Wijnkoop; C A Russell; M A Koopmanschap; H M Kruizenga; S K Lhachimi; K Norman; M J C Nuijten; J M G A Schols
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Assessment of perioperative nutrition practices and attitudes-A national survey of colorectal and GI surgical oncology programs.

Authors:  J D Williams; Paul E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Efficacy of nasal bridles in avoiding percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement.

Authors:  Gwilym Webb; Prakash Gupta; Jo Fitchett; Jon Simmons; Aminda De Silva
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-13

4.  Predicting the outcome of long-term care by clinical and functional indices: the role of nutritional status.

Authors:  L M Donini; M R De Felice; C Savina; C Coletti; M Paolini; A Laviano; L Scavone; B Neri; C Cannella
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 5.  Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Steven Kwasi Korang; Kirstine Halberg Engell; Marie Skøtt Nielsen; Kang Zhang; Maria Didriksen; Lisbeth Lund; Niklas Lindahl; Sara Hallum; Ning Liang; Wenjing Xiong; Xuemei Yang; Pernille Brunsgaard; Alexandre Garioud; Sanam Safi; Jane Lindschou; Jens Kondrup; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-19

6.  Bedside adherence to clinical practice guidelines for enteral nutrition in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a prospective, multi-centre, observational study.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Quenot; Gaetan Plantefeve; Jean-Luc Baudel; Isabelle Camilatto; Emmanuelle Bertholet; Romain Cailliod; Jean Reignier; Jean-Philippe Rigaud
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Quality and safety impact on the provision of parenteral nutrition through introduction of a nutrition support team.

Authors:  C L Hvas; K Farrer; E Donaldson; B Blackett; H Lloyd; C Forde; G Garside; P Paine; S Lal
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals.

Authors:  Henrik H Rasmussen; Mette Holst; Jens Kondrup
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Patients' perspectives of living with a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).

Authors:  Lena Martin; John Blomberg; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  The prevention and reduction of weight loss in an acute tertiary care setting: protocol for a pragmatic stepped wedge randomised cluster trial (the PRoWL project).

Authors:  Alison L Kitson; Timothy J Schultz; Leslye Long; Alison Shanks; Rick Wiechula; Ian Chapman; Stijn Soenen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.