OBJECTIVE: To use a common ethnographic study protocol across five countries to provide data to confirm social and risk settings and risk behaviors, develop the assessment instruments, tailor the intervention, design a process evaluation of the intervention, and design an understandable informed consent process. DESIGN: Methods determined best for capturing the core data elements were selected. Standards for data collection methods were established to enable comparable implementation of the ethnographic study across the five countries. METHODS: The methods selected were participant observation, focus groups, open-ended interviews, and social mapping. Standards included adhering to core data elements, number of participants, mode of data collection, type of data collection instrument, number of data collectors at each type of activity, duration of each type of activity, and type of informed consent administered. Sites had discretion in selecting which methods to use to obtain specific data. RESULTS: The ethnographic studies provided input to the Trial's methods for data collection, described social groups in the target communities, depicted sexual practices, and determined core opinion leader characteristics; thus providing information that drove the adaptation of the intervention and facilitated the selection of venues, behavioral outcomes, and community popular opinion leaders (C-POLs). CONCLUSION: The described rapid ethnographic approach worked well across the five countries, where findings allowed local adaptation of the intervention. When introducing the C-POL intervention in new areas, local non-governmental and governmental community and health workers can use this rapid ethnographic approach to identify the communities, social groups, messages, and C-POLs best suited for local implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To use a common ethnographic study protocol across five countries to provide data to confirm social and risk settings and risk behaviors, develop the assessment instruments, tailor the intervention, design a process evaluation of the intervention, and design an understandable informed consent process. DESIGN: Methods determined best for capturing the core data elements were selected. Standards for data collection methods were established to enable comparable implementation of the ethnographic study across the five countries. METHODS: The methods selected were participant observation, focus groups, open-ended interviews, and social mapping. Standards included adhering to core data elements, number of participants, mode of data collection, type of data collection instrument, number of data collectors at each type of activity, duration of each type of activity, and type of informed consent administered. Sites had discretion in selecting which methods to use to obtain specific data. RESULTS: The ethnographic studies provided input to the Trial's methods for data collection, described social groups in the target communities, depicted sexual practices, and determined core opinion leader characteristics; thus providing information that drove the adaptation of the intervention and facilitated the selection of venues, behavioral outcomes, and community popular opinion leaders (C-POLs). CONCLUSION: The described rapid ethnographic approach worked well across the five countries, where findings allowed local adaptation of the intervention. When introducing the C-POL intervention in new areas, local non-governmental and governmental community and health workers can use this rapid ethnographic approach to identify the communities, social groups, messages, and C-POLs best suited for local implementation.
Authors: K J Sikkema; J A Kelly; R A Winett; L J Solomon; V A Cargill; R A Roffman; T L McAuliffe; T G Heckman; E A Anderson; D A Wagstaff; A D Norman; M J Perry; D A Crumble; M B Mercer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: M E Bentley; G H Pelto; W L Straus; D A Schumann; C Adegbola; E de la Pena; G A Oni; K H Brown; S L Huffman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 1988 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Amy L Corneli; Ellen G Piwoz; Margaret E Bentley; Agnes Moses; Jacqueline R Nkhoma; Beth Carlton Tohill; Linda Adair; Beatrice Mtimuni; Yusuf Ahmed; Ann Duerr; Peter Kazembe; Charles van der Horst Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2006-08-11 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: David D Celentano; Kenneth H Mayer; Willo Pequegnat; Nadia Abdala; Annette M Green; H Hunter Handsfield; Tyler D Hartwell Journal: Int J Sex Health Date: 2010
Authors: C A Gaydos; P A Rizzo-Price; P Balakrishnan; P Mateta; S R Leon; S Verevochkin; Y P Yin; T C Quinn; L C Strader; W Pequegnat Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Danielle F Haley; Jonathan Lucas; Carol E Golin; Jing Wang; James P Hughes; Lynda Emel; Wafaa El-Sadr; Paula M Frew; Jessica Justman; Adaora A Adimora; Christopher Chauncey Watson; Sharon Mannheimer; Anne Rompalo; Lydia Soto-Torres; Zandraetta Tims-Cook; Yvonne Carter; Sally L Hodder Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Alicia O'Cathain; Pat Hoddinott; Simon Lewin; Kate J Thomas; Bridget Young; Joy Adamson; Yvonne Jfm Jansen; Nicola Mills; Graham Moore; Jenny L Donovan Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2015-09-07