Literature DB >> 17413084

The courts, public health, and legal preparedness.

Daniel D Stier1, Diane Nicks, Gregory J Cowan.   

Abstract

The judicial branch's key roles, as guardian of civil liberties and protector of the rule of law, can be acutely relevant during public health emergencies when courts may need to issue orders authorizing actions to protect public health or restraining public health actions that are determined to unduly interfere with civil rights. Legal preparedness for public health emergencies, therefore, necessitates an understanding of the court system and how courts are involved in public health issues. In this article we briefly describe the court system and then focus on what public health practitioners need to know about the judicial system in a public health emergency, including the courts' roles and the consequent need to keep courts open during emergencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413084      PMCID: PMC1854991          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.101881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  2 in total

1.  State courts and public health: building partnerships to enhance preparedness.

Authors:  Patricia M Sweeney; Samuel Stebbins; Daniel D Stier; Zygmont Pines
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  Global Judicial Opinions Regarding Government-Issued COVID-19 Mitigation Measures.

Authors:  Catherine G Clodfelter; Sarah Caron; Emily L Rosenfeld; Akshara Narayan Menon; Amanda Sasser; Emmanuelle K Mercier; C Adam Brush
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2022-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.