Literature DB >> 17412782

Refinements in modeling the passive properties of laryngeal soft tissue.

Eric J Hunter1, Ingo R Titze.   

Abstract

The nonlinear viscoelastic passive properties of three canine intrinsic laryngeal muscles, the lateral cricoarytenoid (LCA), the posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA), and the interarytenoid (IA), were fit to the parameters of a modified Kelvin model. These properties were compared with those of the thyroarytenoid (TA) and cricothyroid (CT) muscles, as well as previously unpublished viscoelastic characteristics of the human vocal ligament. Passive parameters of the modified Kelvin model were summarized for the vocal ligament, mucosa, and all five laryngeal muscles. Results suggest that the LCA, PCA, and IA muscles are functionally different from the TA and CT muscles in their load-bearing capacity. Furthermore, the LCA, PCA, and IA have a much larger stress-strain hysteresis effect than has been previously reported for the TA and CT or the vocal ligament. The variation in this effect suggests that the connective tissue within the TA and CT muscles is somehow similar to the vocal ligament but different from the LCA, PCA, or IA muscles. Further demonstrating the potential significance of grouping tissues in the laryngeal system by functional groups in the laryngeal system was the unique finding that, over their working elongation range, the LCA and PCA were nearly as exponentially stiff as the vocal ligament. This paper was written in conjunction with an online technical report (http://www.ncvs.org/ncvs/library/tech) in which comprehensive muscle data and sensitivity analysis, as well as downloadable data files and computer scripts, are made available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412782     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00892.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  18 in total

1.  Frequency response of synthetic vocal fold models with linear and nonlinear material properties.

Authors:  Stephanie M Shaw; Scott L Thomson; Christopher Dromey; Simeon Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Optical measurements of vocal fold tensile properties: implications for phonatory mechanics.

Authors:  Jordan E Kelleher; Thomas Siegmund; Roger W Chan; Erin A Henslee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Reducing the number of vocal fold mechanical tissue properties: evaluation of the incompressibility and planar displacement assumptions.

Authors:  Douglas D Cook; Eric Nauman; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Cervids with different vocal behavior demonstrate different viscoelastic properties of their vocal folds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Susan Lingle; Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  A viscoelastic laryngeal muscle model with active components.

Authors:  Simeon L Smith; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Integrative physiology of fundamental frequency control in birds.

Authors:  Franz Goller; Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2012-12-11

7.  Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  Elasticity and stress relaxation of a very small vocal fold.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Alexander York; Stephen Furst; Rolf Müller; Stefan Seelecke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Elasticity and stress relaxation of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) vocal folds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  A cervid vocal fold model suggests greater glottal efficiency in calling at high frequencies.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.