BACKGROUND: Most patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can restore airflow after an obstructive respiratory event without arousal at least some of the time. The mechanisms that enable this ventilatory recovery are unclear but probably include increased upper airway dilator muscle activity and/or changes in respiratory timing. The aims of this study were to compare the ability to recover ventilation and the mechanisms of compensation following a sudden reduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in subjects with and without OSA. METHODS: Ten obese patients with OSA (mean (SD) apnoea-hypopnoea index 62.6 (12.4) events/h) and 15 healthy non-obese non-snorers were instrumented with intramuscular genioglossus electrodes and a mask/pneumotachograph which was connected to a modified CPAP device that could deliver either continuous positive or negative pressure. During stable non-rapid eye movement sleep the CPAP was repeatedly reduced 2-10 cm H2O below the level required to eliminate flow limitation and was held at this level for 5 min or until arousal from sleep occurred. RESULTS: During reduced CPAP the increases in genioglossus activity (311.5 (49.4)% of baseline in subjects with OSA and 315.4 (76.2)% of baseline in non-snorers, p = 0.9) and duty cycle (123.8 (3.9)% of baseline in subjects with OSA and 118.2 (2.8)% of baseline in non-snorers, p = 0.4) were similar in both groups, yet patients with OSA could restore ventilation without cortical arousal less often than non-snorers (54.1% vs 65.7% of pressure drops, p = 0.04). When ventilatory recovery did not occur, genioglossus muscle and respiratory timing changes still occurred but these did not yield adequate pharyngeal patency/ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Compensatory mechanisms (increased genioglossus muscle activity and/or duty cycle) often restore ventilation during sleep but may be less effective in obese patients with OSA than in non-snorers.
BACKGROUND: Most patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can restore airflow after an obstructive respiratory event without arousal at least some of the time. The mechanisms that enable this ventilatory recovery are unclear but probably include increased upper airway dilator muscle activity and/or changes in respiratory timing. The aims of this study were to compare the ability to recover ventilation and the mechanisms of compensation following a sudden reduction of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in subjects with and without OSA. METHODS: Ten obesepatients with OSA (mean (SD) apnoea-hypopnoea index 62.6 (12.4) events/h) and 15 healthy non-obese non-snorers were instrumented with intramuscular genioglossus electrodes and a mask/pneumotachograph which was connected to a modified CPAP device that could deliver either continuous positive or negative pressure. During stable non-rapid eye movement sleep the CPAP was repeatedly reduced 2-10 cm H2O below the level required to eliminate flow limitation and was held at this level for 5 min or until arousal from sleep occurred. RESULTS: During reduced CPAP the increases in genioglossus activity (311.5 (49.4)% of baseline in subjects with OSA and 315.4 (76.2)% of baseline in non-snorers, p = 0.9) and duty cycle (123.8 (3.9)% of baseline in subjects with OSA and 118.2 (2.8)% of baseline in non-snorers, p = 0.4) were similar in both groups, yet patients with OSA could restore ventilation without cortical arousal less often than non-snorers (54.1% vs 65.7% of pressure drops, p = 0.04). When ventilatory recovery did not occur, genioglossus muscle and respiratory timing changes still occurred but these did not yield adequate pharyngeal patency/ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Compensatory mechanisms (increased genioglossus muscle activity and/or duty cycle) often restore ventilation during sleep but may be less effective in obesepatients with OSA than in non-snorers.
Authors: Michael L Stanchina; Atul Malhotra; Robert B Fogel; Najib Ayas; Jill K Edwards; Karen Schory; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Yu-Lun Lo; Amy S Jordan; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman; Raphael C Heinzer; Karen Schory; Louise Dover; Robert B Fogel; David P White Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: H Schneider; S P Patil; S Canisius; E A Gladmon; A R Schwartz; C P O'Donnell; P L Smith; C G Tankersley Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2003-07
Authors: Michael L Stanchina; Atul Malhotra; Robert B Fogel; John Trinder; Jill K Edwards; Karen Schory; David P White Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: John Trinder; Nicholas Allen; Jan Kleiman; Vicki Kralevski; Darci Kleverlaan; Katie Anson; Young Kim Journal: Sleep Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Amy S Jordan; R Doug McEvoy; Jill K Edwards; Karen Schory; Chang-Kook Yang; Peter G Catcheside; Robert B Fogel; Atul Malhotra; David P White Journal: J Physiol Date: 2004-06-24 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Alan R Schwartz; Hartmut Schneider; Philip L Smith; Brian M McGinley; Susheel P Patil; Jason P Kirkness Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Robert L Owens; Bradley A Edwards; Scott A Sands; James P Butler; Danny J Eckert; David P White; Atul Malhotra; Andrew Wellman Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2012-05-24
Authors: Amy S Jordan; Danny J Eckert; Andrew Wellman; John A Trinder; Atul Malhotra; David P White Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Simon A Joosten; Bradley A Edwards; Andrew Wellman; Anthony Turton; Elizabeth M Skuza; Philip J Berger; Garun S Hamilton Journal: Sleep Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Amy S Jordan; David P White; Yu-Lun Lo; Andrew Wellman; Danny J Eckert; Susie Yim-Yeh; Matthias Eikermann; Scott A Smith; Karen E Stevenson; Atul Malhotra Journal: Sleep Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 5.849