Literature DB >> 17412730

STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different? 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition (the OPERA registry).

Gilles Montalescot1, Jean Dallongeville, Eric Van Belle, Stephanie Rouanet, Cathrine Baulac, Alexia Degrandsart, Eric Vicaut.   

Abstract

AIMS: The ESC/ACC redefined myocardial infarction as any amount of necrosis caused by ischaemia. The aim of this study was to describe the management and outcomes using 'real-world' data taking the new definition of acute myocardial infarction into account. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 2,151 consecutive patients (76.0% men) with a myocardial infarction were enrolled at 56 centres in France. The median delay to presentation was shorter in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) vs. non-STEMI (NSTEMI) (4 vs. 7 h, P < 0.0001). STEMI patients were more likely to receive fibrinolysis (28.9 vs. 0.7%, P < 0.0001) or undergo PCI (71.0 vs. 51.6%, P < 0.0001) but less likely to have bypass surgery (3.1 vs. 4.9%, P < 0.05). At discharge, patients with STEMI received more aggressive secondary prevention therapies than those with NSTEMI, which was not supported by differences in disease severity. A total of 1878 patients were followed-up for 1 year: 36.7% of STEMI and 41.5% of NSTEMI patients were rehospitalized (P = 0.05); 16% in both groups were revascularized. In-hospital mortality was similar (4.6 vs. 4.3%), and 1-year mortality was 9.0% in STEMI patients and 11.6% in NSTEMI patients (Log-Rank P = 0.09). Independent correlates of in-hospital mortality were untreated dyslipidaemia, advanced age, diabetes, and low blood pressure. The strongest predictors of 1-year mortality were heart failure and age. Similar predictors were found in STEMI and NSTEMI subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite different management, patients with STEMI and NSTEMI have similar prognoses and independent correlates of outcome. These findings support the new definition of myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412730     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  63 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xu; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Should we improve the management of NSTEMI? Results from the population-based "acute myocardial infarction in Florence 2" (AMI-Florence 2) registry.

Authors:  Daniela Balzi; Mauro Di Bari; Alessandro Barchielli; Piercarlo Ballo; Nazario Carrabba; Antonella Cordisco; Maria Cristina Landini; Giovanni Maria Santoro; Serafina Valente; Alfredo Zuppiroli; Niccolò Marchionni; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Differential classification of acute myocardial infarction into ST- and non-ST segment elevation is not valid or rational.

Authors:  Brendan Phibbs; William Nelson
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Thirty-day Hospital Readmissions in Patients with Non-ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Mayra Tisminetzky; David D McManus; Nathaniel Erskine; Jane S Saczynski; Jorge Yarzebski; Edgard Granillo; Joel Gore; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Comparison of long-term mortality of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Lihui Ren; Huiming Ye; Ping Wang; Yuxia Cui; Shichang Cao; Shuzheng Lv
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  Characteristics of contemporary patients discharged from the hospital after an acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Jane S Saczynski; David D McManus; Molly E Waring; Richard McManus; Jeroan Allison; David C Parish; Darleen Lessard; Sharina Person; Joel M Gore; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Predictive models for short- and long-term adverse outcomes following discharge in a contemporary population with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Dharam J Kumbhani; Brian J Wells; A Michael Lincoff; Anil Jain; Susana Arrigain; Changhong Yu; Marlene Goormastic; Stephen G Ellis; Eugene Blackstone; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-02-17

8.  Low levels of soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Authors:  Erick D McNair; Calvin R Wells; A Mabood Qureshi; Rashpal S Basran; Colin Pearce; Jason Orvold; Jacobus Devilliers; Kailash Prasad
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2009

9.  Validity and utility of ICD-10 administrative health data for identifying ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on physician chart review.

Authors:  Alka B Patel; Hude Quan; Robert C Welsh; Jessica Deckert-Sookram; Wayne Tymchak; Sunil Sookram; Ian Surdhar; Padma Kaul
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-10-02

10.  Shorter Door-to-Balloon Time in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Saves Insurance Payments: A Single Hospital Experience in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chieh-Min Fan; Chao-Lun Lai; Ai-Hsien Li; Kuo-Piao Chung; Ming-Chin Yang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.