Literature DB >> 17412612

Face recognition and cortical responses: effect of stimulus duration.

Topi Tanskanen1, Risto Näsänen, Helena Ojanpää, Riitta Hari.   

Abstract

To clarify the relationship between face perception and cortical activation, we manipulated the face recognition performance of 9 subjects by varying the duration (DUR) of stimuli while cortical neuromagnetic responses were recorded. A face image replaced a continuous pixel-noise mask for 17-200 ms, and the subject reported which of the pre-learned faces had been presented. Two cortical responses were clearly stronger to intact than phase-scrambled faces: the temporo-occipital response peaking at 140-200 ms (M170) and a more widely distributed response peaking at 200-500 ms (M300). For the shortest DURs (17-33 ms), face recognition was at chance level and the cortical responses negligible. For DURs of 50-83 ms, the proportion of recognized faces as well as the strength of cortical responses increased steeply. Recognition performance saturated at DURs of around 100 ms, whereas cortical responses continued to increase until the longest DUR of 200 ms. Amplitudes of both M170 and M300 were thus tightly correlated with recognition performance (r=0.98), but comparison of the increment rates as a function of DUR showed the recognition performance to have an even closer similarity to M170 than to M300. In single-trial analysis the variability of response strengths increased in a direct proportion to response amplitude, demonstrating the averaged responses to be composed of graded rather than of all-or-nothing-type single responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412612     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  7 in total

1.  Implicit attitudes in prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Kristine M Knutson; Karen A DeTucci; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Functional brain segmentation using inter-subject correlation in fMRI.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Kauppi; Juha Pajula; Jari Niemi; Riitta Hari; Jussi Tohka
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Facial expressions of pain modulate observer's long-latency responses in superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Topi Tanskanen; Lauri Parkkonen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  All-or-none face categorization in the human brain.

Authors:  Talia L Retter; Fang Jiang; Michael A Webster; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Reactivity of dogs' brain oscillations to visual stimuli measured with non-invasive electroencephalography.

Authors:  Miiamaaria V Kujala; Heini Törnqvist; Sanni Somppi; Laura Hänninen; Christina M Krause; Outi Vainio; Jan Kujala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Brain Signals of Face Processing as Revealed by Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Ela I Olivares; Jaime Iglesias; Cristina Saavedra; Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto; Mitchell Valdés-Sosa
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Cyril R Pernet; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.