Literature DB >> 17412255

Quality--a radiology imperative: report of the 2006 Intersociety Conference.

N Reed Dunnick1, Kimberly E Applegate, Ronald L Arenson.   

Abstract

Recent publications by the Institute of Medicine have pointed out the many medical errors that occur and the adverse effect of those errors on patient outcomes. These errors are often the result of problems within our health care systems. In an effort to improve patient care outcomes, many health care providers have developed improved policies and practices. Third-party payers are encouraging participation in quality efforts through a variety of mechanisms, including pay for performance, pay for participation, and the creation of centers of excellence. If the quality of health care is to be improved and monitored, appropriate metrics must be developed. Such metrics must be within the control of providers, measurable, and likely to improve patient outcomes. The participants of the 2006 Intersociety Conference developed 49 metrics, which are offered for adoption by health care networks, payers, and regulation agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17412255     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process.

Authors:  Àlex Rovira; Mike P Wattjes; Mar Tintoré; Carmen Tur; Tarek A Yousry; Maria P Sormani; Nicola De Stefano; Massimo Filippi; Cristina Auger; Maria A Rocca; Frederik Barkhof; Franz Fazekas; Ludwig Kappos; Chris Polman; David Miller; Xavier Montalban
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Quality metrics currently used in academic radiology departments: results of the QUALMET survey.

Authors:  Eric A Walker; Jonelle M Petscavage-Thomas; Joseph S Fotos; Michael A Bruno
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Defining Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ron Blankstein; Jill E Jacobs; Jonathon A Leipsic; Raymond Y Kwong; Viviany R Taqueti; Rob S B Beanlands; Jennifer H Mieres; Scott D Flamm; Thomas C Gerber; John Spertus; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Prasad R Shankar; Ellen Higgins; Angy Perez Martinez; Elizabeth Lee; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-08

5.  Structured reporting of x-rays for atraumatic shoulder pain: advantages over free text?

Authors:  Franziska Schöppe; Wieland H Sommer; Florian Schmidutz; Dominik Pförringer; Marco Armbruster; Karolin J Paprottka; Jessica L V Plum; Bastian O Sabel; Felix G Meinel; Nora N Sommer
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.930

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.