Literature DB >> 17412146

Pay for performance in radiology: ACR white paper.

James W Moser1, Pamela A Wilcox, Sandra S Bjork, Trudie Cushing, Maurine Dennis, John E Greissing, Kathryn Keysor, Judith McKenzie, Jeffrey C Weinreb.   

Abstract

During the next few years, some portion of physician reimbursement will be increasingly based on the quality and efficiency of service, a practice commonly referred to as pay for performance (P4P). Performance benchmarks are the discrete parameters of structure, process, or outcome metrics whose attainment defines good quality care. Private payers are already rewarding primary care physicians for practices that adhere to quality standards, are efficient, involve information technology, and result in high patient satisfaction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will have completed the development of performance measures to be used in Medicare payment strategies for all specialties by the end of 2006 and anticipates phasing in the program fully by 2008. This article describes P4P, its importance to the ACR, the organizations involved in developing it, the ACR's activities to date, and the steps the ACR must take to ensure that radiologists are remunerated fairly as physician payment becomes based, in part, on performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17412146     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

Review 1.  Quo vadis? Trends in demographics and pediatric care and their impact on the specialty of pediatric radiology.

Authors:  George A Taylor
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-06-30

2.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 4: quality analytics.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Balancing radiation dose and image quality: clinical applications of neck volume CT.

Authors:  M T Russell; J R Fink; F Rebeles; K Kanal; M Ramos; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure.

Authors:  Sonia Gaur; Prasad R Shankar; Ellen Higgins; Angy Perez Martinez; Elizabeth Lee; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-05-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.