Literature DB >> 17411981

Quality management in radiology: historical aspects and basic definitions.

Sukru Mehmet Erturk1, Silvia Ondategui-Parra, Pablo R Ros.   

Abstract

In today's extremely competitive economic environment, the quality management processes used by industrial companies have become commonplace at hospitals and are proving successful in improving quality and controlling costs. Continuous quality improvement (CQI) methods provide a relatively new way, compared with quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) methods, to improve the quality of health care. Continuous quality improvement should be considered a philosophy rather than simply a methodology; it assumes no endpoints in improvement efforts and does not attempt to replace the older concepts of QA and QC but rather to reap their benefits and take them to a higher conceptual level. Continuous quality improvement has 4 foci: (1) to determine and meet the needs of patients and customers, (2) to approach quality improvement holistically on the basis of the identification of the underlying cause of poor performance, (3) to apply fact-based management and scientific methodology, and (4) to empower its practitioners to improve quality on a daily basis. Health care institutions and radiology departments use a variety of CQI systems or models, including the model of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, the Six Sigma model, and the Model for Business Excellence of the European Foundation for Quality Management. The International Organization for Standardization 9000, which creates a suitable organizational environment for the implementation of a CQI system, can be considered an effective QA and QC method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411981     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

1.  Evolutionistic or revolutionary paths? A PACS maturity model for strategic situational planning.

Authors:  Rogier van de Wetering; Ronald Batenburg; Reeva Lederman
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Maintaining quality control using a radiological digital X-ray dashboard.

Authors:  Todd R Minnigh; Jacqueline Gallet
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  ISO 9001 certification for hospitals in Bulgaria: does it help service?

Authors:  Assena Stoimenova; Ani Stoilova; Guenka Petrova
Journal:  Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 1.632

4.  Evolution of X-ray machine quality control acceptance indices.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Nana I Ebisawa; Maria de Fatima A Magon; Yvone M Mascarenhas
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.