Literature DB >> 17411863

Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases.

Wilson S Wong1, Ivan Roubal, David B Jackson, William N Paik, Victor K J Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Outsourcing after-hours radiology coverage to a teleradiology coverage company has become common in recent years. However, concerns have been raised over the quality of these types of coverage and the implications on patient care. This study details the quality assurance program of a teleradiology company that provides after-hours coverage to 64 California hospitals.
METHOD: The records of all examinations interpreted by 10 radiologists during 2003 were reviewed. Interpretations were compared with the final interpretations of the host practices and evaluated for timeliness.
RESULTS: A total of 124,870 radiologic studies were interpreted by 10 teleradiologists during 2003. Computed tomography (CT) comprised 74% of these examinations: CT head (35%) examinations were the most commonly transmitted examinations, and CT abdomen/pelvis examinations were the second most common studies (27%). The average turnaround time was 12.2 min; 93% of the examinations were reported within 30 min, and 99% were completed within 1 hour. The overall discordant rate for individual teleradiologists ranged from 0.70% to 1.41%, with an average of 1.09%. Of the most commonly ordered examinations, CT of the abdomen/pelvis had the highest rate of discordance, at 2.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Outsourcing to a teleradiology program with an active quality-assurance program can be safe. An active quality-assurance program should be an integral component of any teleradiology program. Constant feedback improves the performance of the radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411863     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  12 in total

1.  Quality control in neuroradiology: discrepancies in image interpretation among academic neuroradiologists.

Authors:  L S Babiarz; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Systematic survey of discrepancy rates in an international teleradiology service.

Authors:  Anjali Agrawal; Anurag Agrawal; Meenakshi Pandit; Arjun Kalyanpur
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-08-25

Review 3.  Information technology conduit as a portal to circumvent the graveyard shift.

Authors:  Amar Gupta; Shawna Sando; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Pediatric teleradiology outsourcing: downside considerations.

Authors:  William E Shiels
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-06-05

5.  Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Duty of candour: implications for radiologists.

Authors:  Nicola Hilary Strickland
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  The Influences of Genetic and Environmental Factors on Methylome-wide Association Studies for Human Diseases.

Authors:  Yan V Sun
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2014-12-01

Review 8.  A twin approach to unraveling epigenetics.

Authors:  Jordana T Bell; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 9.  Mapping turnaround times (TAT) to a generic timeline: a systematic review of TAT definitions in clinical domains.

Authors:  Bernhard Breil; Fleur Fritz; Volker Thiemann; Martin Dugas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Emerging technologies for telemedicine.

Authors:  Minh Duc Cao; Cao Duc Minh; Shuji Shimizu; Yasuaki Antoku; Nobuhiro Torata; Kuriko Kudo; Koji Okamura; Naoki Nakashima; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.