Literature DB >> 17411780

Report of the ACR task force on international teleradiology.

Arl Van Moore1, Bibb Allen, Shannon C Campbell, Richard A Carlson, N Reed Dunnick, Thomas B Fletcher, J Daniel Hanks, J Bruce Hauser, James M Moorefield, Richard N Taxin, James H Thrall.   

Abstract

Telemedicine is becoming an increasingly important tool in the practice of medicine throughout the world. For radiologists, telemedicine translates to teleradiology. Because an increasing amount of imaging is now archived in a digital format, and with the application of more powerful computers in radiology, digital image transmission between display stations is becoming commonplace. The ability to move large diagnostic image data sets to display stations anywhere in the world using the Internet and other high-speed data links is solving some problems and creating others. Medicine and radiology will be challenged in many ways by the issues created from the application of this burgeoning technology. Our task force was charged with investigating the evolving practice of international teleradiology and with developing a pubic statement to be adopted by the ACR Council (). This white paper is our effort to define those issues we believe to be most pertinent to international teleradiology as we know them today. Will these issues be changing? Certainly. For some facets of the issue, there are currently more questions than answers. We describe several scenarios that we believe are acceptable practices of international teleradiology as well as some that are not. We believe that much will be written about international teleradiology in the future as the issues of credentialing, quality assurance, licensure, American Board of Radiology certification, the maintenance of certification, jurisdictional and medical liability issues, patient privacy, fraud and medical ethics are more precisely defined and shaped by state and federal legislation and medical jurisprudence. This white paper is our assessment of what we believe to be the major challenges that exist as of this writing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411780     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  6 in total

1.  Utility of contemporaneous dual read in the setting of emergency teleradiology reporting.

Authors:  Anjali Agrawal; D B Koundinya; Jayadeepa Srinivas Raju; Anurag Agrawal; Arjun Kalyanpur
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-11-18

2.  Quality care and safety know no borders.

Authors:  Jp Borgstede; Pa Wilcox
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-07-01

3.  ESR white paper on teleradiology: an update from the teleradiology subgroup.

Authors: 
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-01-18

4.  [Peer Review of Teleradiology at a Teleradiology Clinic: Comparison of Unacceptable Diagnosis and Clinically Significant Discrepancy between Radiology Sections and Imaging Modalities].

Authors:  Hyung Suk Seo; Jai Soung Park; Yu-Whan Oh; Dongwook Sung; A Leum Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-08-27

5.  An informatics model for guiding assembly of telemicrobiology workstations for malaria collaborative diagnostics using commodity products and open-source software.

Authors:  West Suhanic; Ian Crandall; Peter Pennefather
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 6.  Standards and Guidelines in Telemedicine and Telehealth.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jordana Bernard
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2014-02-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.