Literature DB >> 17411762

The ACR appropriateness criteria: translation to practice and research.

Chris Lee Sistrom1.   

Abstract

The ACR Appropriateness Criteria (ACRAC) are now just about a decade old. Along with a continued commitment to update and add to these guidelines, the author advocates that the ACR undertake the task of converting the current text-based contents into a comprehensive, multipurpose relational database. A candidate structure for such a database is described, and several uses for it are articulated. The accompanying policy discussion advocates efforts to widely disseminate the resulting ACRAC database for use by payers in setting reimbursement and by hospitals in radiology order entry software. Also described are some ways that the ACRAC, formatted as a database, can be used for health services research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411762     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

1.  The role of informatics in health care reform.

Authors:  Yueyi I Liu; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Radiation risk from medical imaging.

Authors:  Eugene C Lin
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Sensitivity and specificity: imperfect predictors of guideline utility in radiology.

Authors:  B Roudsari; C McKinney; D Moore; J Jarvik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures.

Authors:  Martha S Linet; Thomas L Slovis; Donald L Miller; Ruth Kleinerman; Choonsik Lee; Preetha Rajaraman; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Conceptual approach for the design of radiology reporting interfaces: the talking template.

Authors:  Chris L Sistrom
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  [Referral guidelines in diagnostic imaging].

Authors:  G Pärtan; F Kainberger; F Frühwald
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Evidence-based imaging guidelines and Medicare payment policy.

Authors:  Christopher L Sistrom; Niccie L McKay
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Clinicians' justification of imaging: do radiation issues play a role?

Authors:  Lars Borgen; Erling Stranden; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-23

9.  Too Much, Too Mild, Too Early: Diagnosing the Excessive Expansion of Diagnoses.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.