Literature DB >> 17411755

Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline.

David C Kushner1, Leonard L Lucey.   

Abstract

The ACR adopted its "Guideline for Communication: Diagnostic Radiology" in 1991. Since its adoption, the guideline has been the subject of considerable discussion and controversy. In response to more than a decade of debate, the ACR appointed a task force in the summer of 2003 to research and analyze claims and litigation decisions that have been related to the communication or reporting of imaging studies by radiologists. Furthermore, the task force was charged with making recommendations regarding the status and impact of the existing communication guideline. The only specific directions to the task force were to take into account the ACR's motto, "Quality is our image," in the recognition that communication plays an essential role in safety and quality. The task force consulted outside legal counsel, reviewed claims data from many sources, and performed a survey of the ACR's membership. Furthermore, the task force was divided into four working groups to focus on the data and make specific recommendations. The products of the working groups were assembled into a final report that was presented to the ACR Board of Chancellors in the winter of 2004. This report, including five recommendations, and a draft for a new communication guideline were presented to the ACR Council at the annual meeting in May 2004.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 17411755     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  18 in total

1.  Influence of radiology report format on reading time and comprehension.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; E Tyler Hall; Stacy Jaw; Bruce Reiner; Eliot Siegel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  An open-standards grammar for outline-style radiology report templates.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Charles E Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Style and content of CT and MR imaging lumbar spine reports: radiologist and clinician preferences.

Authors:  M Ghali Eskander; A Leung; D Lee
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Customization of medical report data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Innovation opportunities in critical results communication: theoretical concepts.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The radiographic appearance of split Blake drains: what you see is not necessarily what you get.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Gauguet; Sanjay P Prabhu; Frank Pigula; Stephan D Voss
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-07-11

8.  Who You Gonna Call? Automatically Connecting Radiologists to the Right Clinician.

Authors:  Ross Filice
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Structured report compliance: effect on audio dictation time, report length, and total radiologist study time.

Authors:  Tarek N Hanna; Haris Shekhani; Kiran Maddu; Chao Zhang; Zhengjia Chen; Jamlik-Omari Johnson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-25

10.  Standards for radiology interpretation and reporting in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Leonard Berlin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.