Literature DB >> 17411654

Essential practice performance measurement.

Silvia Ondategui-Parra1, Jui G Bhagwat, Ileana E Gill, Eric Nathanson, Steven Seltzer, Pablo R Ros.   

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to provide an overview of how to develop and implement a performance measurement system in radiology departments. Although an extensive literature review (PubMed, MEDLINE, etc) was carried out to search for relevant published scientific papers, the number of publications regarding performance indicators in radiology departments was very limited. The present paper reflects the current approach to performance measurement in health care services based on the available literature, which may be applied to the field of radiology. Performance indicators are tools that evaluate an organizations progress toward its goals . In radiology, in addition to finance, other aspects that affect the functioning of the organization, such as clinical productivity and patient satisfaction, also need to be assessed. The main categories of indicators adopted in radiology departments include: (1) productivity, (2) finance, (3) patient safety, (4) access, and (5) customer satisfaction. Once specific indicators in each of these categories are selected, the data collection methods should be incorporated into the routine departmental processes. Information obtained should be made available to all stakeholders via various media. In conclusion, performance indicators establish a common denominator in order to make comaparisons of the organization's performance over time. To improve the quality of services, these indicators should be benchmarked, i.e., the processes should be compared to the best in the field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 17411654     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  2 in total

Review 1.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Quality service in radiology.

Authors:  J Hoe
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.