Literature DB >> 17411009

Experimentally determining the iR drop in solution at carbon fiber microelectrodes with current interruption and application to single-cell electroporation.

Bradley A Lambie1, Carrie Brennan, Jessica Olofsson, Owe Orwar, Stephen G Weber.   

Abstract

Single-cell electroporation uses microelectrodes, capillaries, or micropipets positioned near single, adherent cells to increase transiently the membrane permeability of the cell. The increased permeability permits, for example, transfection without chemical reagents. When using microelectrodes to apply an electric field to the cell, there is a question of how much voltage to apply. Unlike in bulk electroporation, where hundreds of volts may be applied between electrodes, a rather small voltage is applied to a microelectrode in single-cell electroporation. In the single-cell experiment with microelectrodes, a substantial fraction of the voltage is lost at the interface and does not therefore exist in solution. This problem is the same as the classical electrochemist's problem of knowing the "iR" drop in solution and correcting for it to obtain true interfacial potential differences. Therefore, we have used current interruption to determine the iR drop in solution near microcylinder electrodes. As the field is inhomogeneous, calculations are required to understand the field distribution. Results of the current interruption are validated by comparing two independent measurements of the resistance in solution: one value results from the measured iR drop in conjunction with the known applied current. The other value results from a measured solution conductivity and a computed cell constant. We find substantial agreement in the range of resistances from about 2 to 50 kOmega, but not at higher resistances. We propose a simple, four-step plan that takes a few minutes to calculate the approximate current required to electroporate a cell with an electrode of a particular size, shape, and distance from the cell. We validate the approach with electroporation of single A549 cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17411009      PMCID: PMC2529252          DOI: 10.1021/ac062045+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  12 in total

1.  Electropermeabilization of cell membranes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  1999-01-04       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Characterization of single-cell electroporation by using patch-clamp and fluorescence microscopy.

Authors:  F Ryttsén; C Farre; C Brennan; S G Weber; K Nolkrantz; K Jardemark; D T Chiu; O Orwar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes.

Authors:  E Neumann; S Kakorin; K Toensing
Journal:  Bioelectrochem Bioenerg       Date:  1999-02

4.  Quantitative model of small molecules uptake after in vitro cell electropermeabilization.

Authors:  Marko Puc; Tadej Kotnik; Lluis M Mir; Damijan Miklavcic
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.373

5.  Generation of focused electric field patterns at dielectric surfaces.

Authors:  Jessica Olofsson; Mikael Levin; Anette Strömberg; Stephen G Weber; Frida Ryttsén; Owe Orwar
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Controlling the electrochemically active area of carbon fiber microelectrodes by the electrodeposition and selective removal of an insulating photoresist.

Authors:  Bradley A Lambie; Owe Orwar; Stephen G Weber
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 7.  Electroporation of cell membranes.

Authors:  T Y Tsong
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Electropermeabilization of mammalian cells to macromolecules: control by pulse duration.

Authors:  M P Rols; J Teissié
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Quantification of oxidative/nitrosative modification of CYS(34) in human serum albumin using a fluorescence-based SDS-PAGE assay.

Authors:  James P Fabisiak; Andrey Sedlov; Valerian E Kagan
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.401

10.  Pro-oxidant and antioxidant mechanisms of etoposide in HL-60 cells: role of myeloperoxidase.

Authors:  V E Kagan; A I Kuzmenko; Y Y Tyurina; A A Shvedova; T Matsura; J C Yalowich
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  3 in total

1.  A gold coated polystyrene ring microarray formed by two-step patterning: construction of an advanced microelectrode for voltammetric sensing.

Authors:  Aroonsri Ngamaroonchote; Monrudee Liangruksa; Yuranan Hanlumyuang; Tatchai Wijitwiengrat; Rawiwan Laocharoensuk
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.833

2.  Removal of Differential Capacitive Interferences in Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry.

Authors:  Justin A Johnson; Caddy N Hobbs; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Cellular nanointerface of vertical nanostructure arrays and its applications.

Authors:  Aihua Zhang; Jiaru Fang; Xiangling Li; Ji Wang; Meiwan Chen; Hui-Jiuan Chen; Gen He; Xi Xie
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2022-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.