Literature DB >> 17410345

Bone scintigraphy in patients with bipartite patella.

Yoshikazu Oohashi1, Tomihisa Koshino.   

Abstract

This study was performed to assess the diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy to differentiate symptomatic bipartite patella from asymptomatic bipartite patella. Thirty-seven bipartite patellae (15 symptomatic and 22 asymptomatic) were evaluated by bone scintigraphy. Bone scintigraphic activity in bipartite patella was classified into the following four groups. Group A: Eleven bipartite patellae (10 symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic) demonstrated physiological and marked uptake at the epiphysio-metaphysial junction of the distal femur in bone scintiscans. Therefore, high scintigraphic uptake in the bipartite patella was difficult to distinguish from such uptake due to overlap. Group B: Five bipartite patellae (4 symptomatic and 1 asymptomatic) demonstrated both physiologically high scintigraphic uptake at the epiphysio-metaphysial junction of the distal femur and high scintigraphic uptake in the bipartite patella. Group C: Seventeen bipartite patellae (1 symptomatic and 16 asymptomatic) demonstrated abnormally high scintigraphic uptake in the bipartite patella. Group D: Four asymptomatic bipartite patellae did not demonstrate an abnormally high scintigraphic uptake. After excluding Group A, the proportion of positive bone scans in bipartite patella was 84.6% (22 of 26 patellae). Similarly, after excluding Group A, the proportion of positive bone scans in symptomatic bipartite patella was 100% (5 of 5 patellae) and in asymptomatic bipartite patella 81.0% (17 of 21 patellae). Statistical analysis using Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences in the proportion of positive bone scans between both groups (P = 0.5457). In conclusion, abnormally high scintigraphic uptake is frequent findings in both symptomatic and asymptomatic bipartite patella, and bone scintigraphy is not useful to differentiate between them. Therefore, surgical treatment should not be considered based only on scintigraphic findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17410345     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0311-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Bipartite patella fracture.

Authors:  George H Canizares; F Harlan Selesnick
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Bipartite patellae as a cause of disability in the athlete.

Authors:  J K Weaver
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Healing process of osteoarthritis in the knee after high tibial osteotomy. Through observation of strontium-85 scintimetry.

Authors:  T Koshino; N S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1972 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Acute fracture bipartite patella: case report and literature review.

Authors:  M L Ireland; J L Chang
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Painful bipartite patellae. A report of three cases.

Authors:  W T Green
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Painful bipartite patella. A new approach to operative treatment.

Authors:  K Ogata
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  The painful bipartite patella.

Authors:  J A Ogden; S M McCarthy; P Jokl
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Efficacy of lateral retinacular release for painful bipartite patella.

Authors:  Y Mori; H Okumo; H Iketani; Y Kuroki
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Painful bipartite patella following injury.

Authors:  A Iossifidis; R N Brueton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Gout tophus in the bipartite patella.

Authors:  Shigeyoshi Tashiro; Takehiko Sugita; Satoshi Nakamura; Yoshitaka Kurata
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Clinical features and classification of bipartite or tripartite patella.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Oohashi; Tomihisa Koshino; Yoshinori Oohashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Focal lesions of the patella.

Authors:  B Hedayati; A Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Developmental anomaly of ossification type patella partita.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Oohashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Oesophageal carcinoma with solitary patellar metastasis: a rare case report.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Qianqian Zhang; Helin Feng; Xiyan Zhu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of bipartite patella: usefulness and relationship with symptoms.

Authors:  Tuba Akdag; Esra S Guldogan; Huseyin Coskun; Aynur Turan; Baki Hekimoglu
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.