Literature DB >> 17410122

Balancing justice and autonomy in clinical research with healthy volunteers.

N E Kass1, R Myers, E J Fuchs, K A Carson, C Flexner.   

Abstract

In clinical research, ethics review generally first examines whether study risks are reasonable in light of benefits provided. Through informed consent, then, prospective subjects consider whether the risk/benefit balance and procedures are reasonable for them. Unique ethics issues emerge in clinical research with healthy volunteers. Certain types of studies only recruit healthy volunteers as participants. Phase 1 studies, for example, including first time in human studies of investigational drugs and vaccines, generally are conducted in healthy volunteers. Although such research carries inherent and often unknown risks, healthy subjects provide the most efficient target population in which to conduct such research, as these volunteers generally are free of concurrent diseases or medications that could confound interpretation of toxicity. Other studies enrolling healthy volunteers often are simply looking for the most scientifically sound population for the study of normal human physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17410122     DOI: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0009-9236            Impact factor:   6.875


  25 in total

1.  Challenging assumptions about minority participation in US clinical research.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Corey A Kalbaugh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The myth of equipoise in phase 1 clinical trials.

Authors:  Adil E Shamoo
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-11-05

Review 3.  Bridging philosophical and practical implications of incidental findings in brain research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Vivian Nora Chin
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  When a serious adverse event in research occurs, how do other volunteers react?

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Nancy Kass; Rachel K Myers; Edward J Fuchs; Charles Flexner
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Using "clinical trial diaries" to track patterns of participation for serial healthy volunteers in U.S. phase I studies.

Authors:  Heather B Edelblute; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Healthy volunteer registries and ethical research principles.

Authors:  E A Kupetsky-Rincon; W K Kraft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Risks of phase I research with healthy participants: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca A Johnson; Annette Rid; Ezekiel Emanuel; David Wendler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Captive to the Clinic: Phase I Clinical Trials as Temporal Total Institutions.

Authors:  Quintin Williams; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Sociol Inq       Date:  2018-04-20

9.  Views of adolescents and parents on pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.

Authors:  David Wendler; Emily Abdoler; Lori Wiener; Christine Grady
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Payment to healthy volunteers in clinical research: the research subject's perspective.

Authors:  M J Czarny; N E Kass; C Flexner; K A Carson; R K Myers; E J Fuchs
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.