Literature DB >> 17410029

Gemcitabine versus gemcitabine-carboplatin for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status of 2: a prospective randomized phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

Paris A Kosmidis1, Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos, Konstantinos Syrigos, Costas Nicolaides, Gerasimos Aravantinos, Ioannis Boukovinas, Dimitrios Pectasides, George Fountzilas, Dimitrios Bafaloukos, Charalampos Bacoyiannis, Haralampos P Kalofonos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate gemcitabine-carboplatin (GCb) versus single-agent gemcitabine (G) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) of 2. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to either 1250 mg/m of G (arm A) or 1250 mg/m of G plus carboplatin area under the curve of 3 (arm B). Both treatments were given on days 1 and 14 and were repeated every 28 days for up to four cycles.
RESULTS: Among the 90 eligible patients (47 in arm A and 43 in arm B), in arm A, two (4%) had partial responses (95% CI, 0.52%-14.5%) and 10 (21%) had stable disease (95% CI, 10.7%-35.7%). In arm B, six (14%) had partial responses (95% CI, 5.3%-27.9%) and nine (21%) had stable disease (95% CI, 10%-36%) (p = 0.14). No significant difference was found in terms of clinical benefit between the two treatment groups after two cycles of treatment or at the end of chemotherapy. Furthermore, no association was found between clinical benefit and response to treatment (p > 0.05). Median survival was 4.8 months (95% CI, 2.45-7.25) for arm A and 6.7 months (95% CI, 2.47-10.8) for arm B (p = 0.49). Neutropenia (p = 0.007) and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) were more common in group B. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found in terms of severe toxicities (p > 0.05 in all cases).
CONCLUSION: No significant difference was found in terms of clinical benefit in patients with NSCLC and PS 2 who received single-agent G or GCb. Nevertheless, GCb caused more toxicity, particularly neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17410029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  9 in total

1.  Chemotherapy for patients with advanced lung cancer receiving long-term oxygen therapy.

Authors:  Manabu Hayama; Hidekazu Suzuki; Takayuki Shiroyama; Motohiro Tamiya; Norio Okamoto; Ayako Tanaka; Naoko Morishita; Takuji Nishida; Takashi Nishihara; Tomonori Hirashima
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Clinical benefits as endpoints in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with integrative medicine.

Authors:  Dong Xue; Ping-Ping Li
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Results of platinum-based chemotherapy in unselected performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Stéphane Jouveshomme; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with in situ RRM1 and ERCC1 protein levels for response prediction in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Craig Reynolds; Coleman Obasaju; Michael J Schell; Xueli Li; Zhong Zheng; David Boulware; John R Caton; Linda C Demarco; Mark A O'Rourke; Gail Shaw Wright; Kristi A Boehm; Lina Asmar; Jane Bromund; Guangbin Peng; Matthew J Monberg; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase II study of docetaxel and celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, in elderly or poor performance status (PS2) patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shirish M Gadgeel; Antoinette Wozniak; John C Ruckdeschel; Lance K Heilbrun; Raghu Venkatramanamoorthy; Ruth A Chaplen; Michael J Kraut; Gregory P Kalemkerian
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  A multi-centre randomized, open-label phase II trial of continuous erlotinib plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine as first-line therapy in ECOG PS2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  M Michael; N Pavlakis; P Clingan; R De Boer; M Johnston; S Clarke
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  The Japanese Lung Cancer Society Guideline for non-small cell lung cancer, stage IV.

Authors:  Hiroaki Akamatsu; Kiichiro Ninomiya; Hirotsugu Kenmotsu; Masahiro Morise; Haruko Daga; Yasushi Goto; Toshiyuki Kozuki; Satoru Miura; Takaaki Sasaki; Akihiro Tamiya; Shunsuke Teraoka; Yukari Tsubata; Hiroshige Yoshioka; Yoshihiro Hattori; Chiyo K Imamura; Yuki Katsuya; Reiko Matsui; Yuji Minegishi; Hidenori Mizugaki; Kaname Nosaki; Yusuke Okuma; Setsuko Sakamoto; Takashi Sone; Kentaro Tanaka; Shigeki Umemura; Takeharu Yamanaka; Shinsuke Amano; Kazuo Hasegawa; Satoshi Morita; Kazuko Nakajima; Makoto Maemondo; Takashi Seto; Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Pharmacotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Performance Status 2 without Druggable Gene Alterations: Could Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Be a Game Changer?

Authors:  Satoshi Ikeda; Tateaki Naito; Satoru Miura; Kentaro Ito; Naoki Furuya; Toshihiro Misumi; Takashi Ogura; Terufumi Kato
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  nab-Paclitaxel-Based Therapy in Underserved Patient Populations: The ABOUND.PS2 Study in Patients With NSCLC and a Performance Status of 2.

Authors:  Ajeet Gajra; Nagla Abdel Karim; Deborah A Mulford; Liza Cosca Villaruz; Marc Ryan Matrana; Haythem Y Ali; Edgardo S Santos; Tymara Berry; Teng Jin Ong; Alexandra Sanford; Katayoun Amiri; David R Spigel
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.