Literature DB >> 17409797

Does intensive follow-up alter outcome in patients with advanced lung cancer?

Rachel Benamore1, Frances A Shepherd, Natasha Leighl, Melania Pintilie, Milan Patel, Ronald Feld, Stephen Herman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite aggressive multimodality treatment, 5-year survival of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains <30%. To detect relapse, progression, or development of a second primary cancer early, many clinicians perform follow-up scans. To assess the impact of routine scanning, we compared clinical trial patients who had study-mandated scans with those treated off-study who had less intensive radiologic follow-up.
METHODS: The hospital cancer registry and trials databases were searched for patients with locally advanced NSCLC who had undergone multimodality treatment with curative intent. Baseline demographics were collected as well as frequency and results of clinical and radiologic follow-up.
RESULTS: Forty trial patients and 35 nontrial control patients were identified. Trial patients underwent significantly more imaging, particularly in the first 2 years (2.9 versus 2.0 body scans per year, p = 0.0016; 1.1 versus 0.4 brain scans per year, p < 0.001) but did not have more frequent follow-up visits. Forty-five cancers were detected (41 relapses, four metachronous primary tumors) in 44 (59%) patients. Of these, 28 (64%) sought medical attention that led to detection before a scheduled appointment or procedure. There was no significant difference in time to relapse or second primary in trial and nontrial patients (p = 0.80). Twenty-three patients had localized relapse, but only 15 could be treated with curative intent. Despite the trial group demonstrating a higher number of asymptomatic cancers and being offered potentially curative therapy more frequently, there was no significant difference in survival between trial and nontrial patients.
CONCLUSION: In patients with locally advanced NSCLC, frequent cross-sectional imaging does not alter survival after combined modality therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409797     DOI: 10.1097/01.JTO.0000263708.08332.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  15 in total

1.  PET/CT vs. non-contrast CT alone for surveillance 1-year post lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bari Dane; Vadim Grechushkin; April Plank; William Moore; Thomas Bilfinger
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-19

2.  Clinical Impact of Frequent Surveillance Imaging in the First Year Following Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Quoc-Anh Ho; Nima K Harandi; Megan E Daly
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  Differences in patterns of recurrence in early-stage versus locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Feiran Lou; Camelia S Sima; Valerie W Rusch; David R Jones; James Huang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  SSTR2-based reporters for assessing gene transfer into non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation using an intrathoracic mouse model.

Authors:  S P Singh; L Han; R Murali; L Solis; J Roth; L Ji; I Wistuba; V Kundra
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 5.  Post-therapeutic positron emission tomography/computed tomography for early detection of non-small cell lung cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Sonja Sudarski; Thomas Henzler; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08

6.  Does the method of radiologic surveillance affect survival after resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Traves D Crabtree; Varun Puri; Simon B Chen; David S Gierada; Jennifer M Bell; Stephen Broderick; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Imaging surveillance and survival for surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Chao-Kang Jason Liang; Hao He; Thomas K Varghese; David H Au; David R Flum; Steven B Zeliadt
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Surveillance imaging following definitive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: What is the clinical impact?

Authors:  Brandon A Dyer; Megan E Daly
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  Predictors of imaging surveillance for surgically treated early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Leah M Backhus; Farhood Farjah; Steven B Zeliadt; Thomas K Varghese; Aaron Cheng; Larry Kessler; David H Au; David R Flum
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Value-Based Care in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Keith D Eaton; Barbara Jagels; Renato G Martins
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.