Literature DB >> 17408815

A single DNA immunization in combination with electroporation prolongs the primary immune response and maintains immune memory for six months.

Cemaine Tsang1, Shawn Babiuk, Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk, Lorne A Babiuk, Philip Griebel.   

Abstract

Recombinant protein vaccines and vaccines using killed or inactivated pathogens frequently require multiple vaccinations to induce protective immune responses which may be of relatively short duration. Furthermore, increasing concern regarding adverse local and systemic reactions to injected vaccines is driving the quest for vaccine formulations, which induce protective immunity following a single administration. Vaccine studies frequently evaluate immune responses and disease protection within a relatively short interval following primary and secondary immunizations and, therefore, fail to address the duration of immunological memory or protection. DNA vaccines offer a unique opportunity to enhance the duration of immune responses through their capacity for prolonged antigen expression. The route of DNA vaccination and the method of plasmid delivery are critical factors, which can determine transfection efficiency and the duration of vaccine antigen production. Studies were completed which demonstrated that a single intramuscular DNA vaccination, when combined with electroporation, significantly enhanced the onset and duration but not the magnitude of the primary antibody response. A secondary protein vaccination was performed 6 months after the primary DNA immunization. A significant (p < or = 0.0001) correlation was observed between both the magnitude (r2 = 0.40) and duration (r2 = 0.74) of the primary antibody response and the occurrence of a secondary antibody response. Therefore, an effective primary DNA vaccination has the potential to significantly prolong the duration of an antibody response and possibly reduce the frequency of revaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17408815     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of plasmid vaccine immunization schedules using intradermal in vivo electroporation.

Authors:  David Hallengärd; B Kristian Haller; Anna-Karin Maltais; Eva Gelius; Kopek Nihlmark; Britta Wahren; Andreas Bråve
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-07-13

2.  Markedly enhanced immunogenicity of a Pfs25 DNA-based malaria transmission-blocking vaccine by in vivo electroporation.

Authors:  Ralph LeBlanc; Yessika Vasquez; Drew Hannaman; Nirbhay Kumar
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Two doses of bovine viral diarrhea virus DNA vaccine delivered by electroporation induce long-term protective immune responses.

Authors:  Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk; Zoe Lawman; Marlene Snider; Don Wilson; Jan V van den Hurk; Barry Ellefsen; Drew Hannaman
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-12-05

4.  Adenovirus induction of IRF3 occurs through a binary trigger targeting Jun N-terminal kinase and TBK1 kinase cascades and type I interferon autocrine signaling.

Authors:  Marcelo Nociari; Oksana Ocheretina; Mary Murphy; Erik Falck-Pedersen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Posttranscriptional regulatory elements enhance antigen expression and DNA vaccine efficacy.

Authors:  Jing Sun; Dingfeng Li; Yanling Hao; Yuwei Zhang; Wenling Fan; Jingjing Fu; Yunzhang Hu; Yong Liu; Yiming Shao
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.311

6.  Optimization of skin electroporation in mice to increase tolerability of DNA vaccine delivery to patients.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Roos; Fredrik Eriksson; Derin C Walters; Pavel Pisa; Alan D King
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 11.454

7.  A DNA adjuvant encoding a fusion protein between anti-CD3 single-chain Fv and AIMP1 enhances T helper type 1 cell-mediated immune responses in antigen-sensitized mice.

Authors:  Byeong Cheol Lee; Insug O'Sullivan; Eugene Kim; Sang Gyu Park; Seung Yong Hwang; Daeho Cho; Tae Sung Kim
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 7.397

8.  The relative immunogenicity of DNA vaccines delivered by the intramuscular needle injection, electroporation and gene gun methods.

Authors:  Shixia Wang; Chunghua Zhang; Lu Zhang; Jun Li; Zuhu Huang; Shan Lu
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  A combination of intradermal jet-injection and electroporation overcomes in vivo dose restriction of DNA vaccines.

Authors:  David Hallengärd; Andreas Bråve; Maria Isaguliants; Pontus Blomberg; Jenny Enger; Richard Stout; Alan King; Britta Wahren
Journal:  Genet Vaccines Ther       Date:  2012-08-08

10.  A single immunization with HA DNA vaccine by electroporation induces early protection against H5N1 avian influenza virus challenge in mice.

Authors:  Liyun Zheng; Fuyan Wang; Zhongdong Yang; Jianjun Chen; Haiyan Chang; Ze Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.