Literature DB >> 17407635

Clinical practice and recent recommendations in hypertension management--reporting a gap in a global survey of 1259 primary care physicians in 17 countries.

Peter Bramlage1, Martin Thoenes, Wilhelm Kirch, Claude Lenfant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High blood pressure (BP) is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Effective antihypertensive pharmacotherapy is available but recognition and proper management of hypertension and BP goal achievement is still poor. Therefore, it was hypothesized that physicians' attitude towards high BP, as well as patients' perception and knowledge, may influence actual management of hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Telephone interviews were carried out with a random sample of 1259 primary care physicians in 17 countries worldwide from 12 December 2005 to 13 January 2006 using a central computer assisted telephone interview methodology (CATI).
RESULTS: (1) Physicians believed that 62 +/- 21% of their patients had their BP controlled. (2) They were mostly in line with guideline recommended BP goals and 96% were aware of the elevated cardiovascular risk of hypertension, but 41% aimed to reduce BP to acceptable levels only. (3) Physicians indicated that in 41% of patients monotherapy controls BP and 71% would escalate to combination therapy after monotherapy failure. (4) 54% regard hypertension management as difficult. (5) Physicians estimated that between 60 and 70% of patients know their BP goal but thought that there was still room for improvement of hypertension management on the patient side.
CONCLUSION: Although many effective treatment options for arterial hypertension exist, BP goal achievement worldwide is suboptimal, leaving patients at an unnecessary cardiovascular risk. An increase in patients' awareness and compliance together with an increased adherence of physicians to current guidelines should help in reducing the long term cardiovascular consequences of hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407635     DOI: 10.1185/030079907x182077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  24 in total

1.  Psychosomatic medicine in primary care: influence of training.

Authors:  Christian Fazekas; Franziska Matzer; Elfriede R Greimel; Gabriele Moser; Manfred Stelzig; Wolf Langewitz; Bernd Loewe; Walter Pieringer; Elisabeth Jandl-Jager
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 2.  Translating research into evidence-based practice: the National Cancer Institute Community Clinical Oncology Program.

Authors:  Lori M Minasian; William R Carpenter; Bryan J Weiner; Darrell E Anderson; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stefanie Nelson; Cynthia Whitman; Joseph Kelaghan; Ann M O'Mara; Arnold D Kaluzny
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Is there a predictive profile for clinical inertia in hypertensive patients? An observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study.

Authors:  Vicente Gil-Guillén; Domingo Orozco-Beltrán; Emilio Márquez-Contreras; Ramón Durazo-Arvizu; Richard Cooper; Salvador Pita-Fernández; Diego González-Segura; Concepción Carratalá-Munuera; José Luis Martín de Pablo; Vicente Pallarés; Salvador Pertusa-Martínez; Antonio Fernández; Josep Redón
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  [Objective KONTROL study: therapeutic inertia in hypertensive patients attended in primary care of Spain].

Authors:  Carlos Sanchis Doménech; José Luis Llisterri Caro; Vicente Palomo Sanz; Francisco Javier Alonso Moreno; Isidro López Rodríguez; Armando Nevado Loro; Miguel Ángel Zamorano; Natividad Gil García; M Dolores Aguilar Conesa; Pablo Lázaro Y de Mercado
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  Effects of manidipine vs. amlodipine on intrarenal haemodynamics in patients with arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Christian Ott; Markus P Schneider; Ulrike Raff; Martin Ritt; Kristina Striepe; Marco Alberici; Roland E Schmieder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  An international survey of physician and patient understanding, perception, and attitudes to atrial fibrillation and its contribution to cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Etienne Aliot; Günter Breithardt; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Gregory Y H Lip; Panos E Vardas; Markus Wagner
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Physician cardiovascular disease risk factor management: practices in France vs the United States.

Authors:  Richard J Schuster; Olivier Steichen; Oluseye Ogunmoroti; Sylvia Ellison; Nancy Terwoord; Didier Duhot; Michel Beaufils
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  A titrate-to-goal study of switching patients uncontrolled on antihypertensive monotherapy to fixed-dose combinations of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil ± hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Matthew R Weir; Willa A Hsueh; Shawna D Nesbitt; Thomas J Littlejohn; Alan Graff; Ali Shojaee; William F Waverczak; Chunlin Qian; Christopher J Jones; Joel M Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Blood pressure control in hypertensive patients in Irish primary care practices.

Authors:  Brendan Buckley; Eamonn Shanahan; Niall Colwell; Eva Turgonyi; Peter Bramlage; Ivan J Perry
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.