Literature DB >> 17407543

The relationship between isoprene emission rate and dark respiration rate in white poplar (Populus alba L.) leaves.

Francesco Loreto1, Mauro Centritto, Csengele Barta, Carlo Calfapietra, Silvano Fares, Russell K Monson.   

Abstract

In past studies, it was hypothesized that reductions in chloroplast isoprene emissions at high atmospheric CO(2) concentrations were caused by competition between cytosolic and mitochondrial processes for the same substrate, possibly phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP). We conducted field and laboratory experiments using leaves of white poplar (Populus alba L.) to identify whether an inverse relationship occurs between the dark respiration rate (a mitochondrial process) and the isoprene emission rate. Field experiments that were carried out in a free-air CO(2)-enriched (FACE) facility showed no clear effect of elevated CO(2) on either isoprene emission rate or respiration rate by leaves. In young, not yet fully expanded leaves, low isoprene emission and high dark respiration rates were measured in both ambient and elevated CO(2). In these leaves, isoprene emission was inversely correlated with dark respiration. It is possible to interpret from these results that, in young leaves, high rates of growth respiration compete with isoprene biosynthesis for the same substrate. However, it is also possible that the negative correlation reflects the contrasting reductions in growth respiration and increases in expression of the enzyme isoprene synthase at this final stage of leaf maturation. In contrast to our observations on young leaves, respiration rate and isoprene emission rate were positively correlated in older, fully expanded leaves (8 and 11 from apex). A positive correlation was also found between respiration rate and isoprene emission rate when these parameters were modulated using different ozone exposure, growth light intensity, growth temperature and exposure to different leaf temperatures in laboratory experiments. These data show that competition for substrate between isoprene biosynthesis and leaf respiration does not determine the rate of isoprene emission in most circumstances that affect both processes. A negative correlation was observed across all experiments between isoprene emission rate and the activity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPc), a cytosolic enzyme that competes with isoprene biosynthesis for substrate. The cytosolic metabolite, PEP, occurs at a metabolic branch point from which substrate flows into three processes: (1) the production of pyruvate for mitochondrial respiration, (2) the production of oxaloacetate (OAA) by PEPc for anabolic support of mitochondrial respiration and (3) transport into the chloroplast to support chloroplastic demands for pyruvate, including isoprenoid biosynthesis. The results of our observations suggest that only the second process competes for substrate with isoprenoid synthesis, while the partitioning of PEP between mitochondrial respiration and chloroplast isoprenoid biosynthesis is controlled in a way that retains balance in substrate demand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407543     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01648.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  21 in total

1.  Isoprene Acts as a Signaling Molecule in Gene Networks Important for Stress Responses and Plant Growth.

Authors:  Zhaojiang Zuo; Sarathi M Weraduwage; Alexandra T Lantz; Lydia M Sanchez; Sean E Weise; Jie Wang; Kevin L Childs; Thomas D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Nutrient-rich plants emit a less intense blend of volatile isoprenoids.

Authors:  Marcos Fernández-Martínez; Joan Llusià; Iolanda Filella; Ülo Niinemets; Almut Arneth; Ian J Wright; Francesco Loreto; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Application of a coupled model of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance for estimating plant physiological response to pollution by fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

Authors:  Weiqing Yu; Yujie Wang; Yunqi Wang; Bai Li; Yanju Liu; Xuan Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effect of temperature on postillumination isoprene emission in oak and poplar.

Authors:  Ziru Li; Ellen A Ratliff; Thomas D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Alternative Carbon Sources for Isoprene Emission.

Authors:  Vinícius Fernandes de Souza; Ülo Niinemets; Bahtijor Rasulov; Claudia E Vickers; Sergio Duvoisin Júnior; Wagner L Araújo; José Francisco de Carvalho Gonçalves
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  Temperature response of isoprene emission in vivo reflects a combined effect of substrate limitations and isoprene synthase activity: a kinetic analysis.

Authors:  Bahtijor Rasulov; Katja Hüve; Irina Bichele; Agu Laisk; Ulo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Elevation of night-time temperature increases terpenoid emissions from Betula pendula and Populus tremula.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ibrahim; Maarit Mäenpää; Viivi Hassinen; Sari Kontunen-Soppela; Lukás Malec; Matti Rousi; Liisa Pietikäinen; Arja Tervahauta; Sirpa Kärenlampi; Jarmo K Holopainen; Elina J Oksanen
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 8.  Isoprene emission from plants: why and how.

Authors:  Thomas D Sharkey; Amy E Wiberley; Autumn R Donohue
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 9.  A unified mechanism of action for volatile isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress.

Authors:  Claudia E Vickers; Jonathan Gershenzon; Manuel T Lerdau; Francesco Loreto
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 15.040

10.  Postillumination isoprene emission: in vivo measurements of dimethylallyldiphosphate pool size and isoprene synthase kinetics in aspen leaves.

Authors:  Bahtijor Rasulov; Lucian Copolovici; Agu Laisk; Ulo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.