Literature DB >> 17407134

Validation and comparison of contemporary prognostic models in primary myelofibrosis: analysis based on 334 patients from a single institution.

Ayalew Tefferi1, Jocelin Huang, Susan Schwager, Chin-Yang Li, Wenting Wu, Animesh Pardanani, Ruben A Mesa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is predicted by several prognostic scoring systems (PSSs); the most widely recognized is that of Dupriez. Two other PSSs, Cervantes and Mayo, were recently reported as being more useful in younger patients. The current study compares these 3 PSSs among all age groups.
METHODS: The Mayo Clinic PMF database was queried to identify a consecutive series of patients in whom pretreatment bone marrow and complete blood count (CBC), obtained within 6 months of diagnosis, were available for review.
RESULTS: Among 334 study patients (median age, 57 years), median survival was 70 months. Multivariable analysis of all 6 adverse prognostic factors utilized in the aforementioned PSSs (ie, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocyte count <4 or >30 x 10(9)/L, constitutional symptoms, circulating blasts > or = 1%, platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L, absolute monocyte count > or = 1 x 10(9)/L) identified all but platelet count as being significant. The Mayo PSS, which is based on the 4 CBC-derived parameters (ie, hemoglobin, platelet, leukocyte, and monocyte counts), displayed a better hazard ratio profile compared with the other 2 PSSs in identifying long-lived patients as well as delineating intermediate-risk disease category. The latter effect was even more pronounced in patients younger than age 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo PSS for survival in PMF is an objective CBC-derived prognostic model that might be superior in its performance over that of either the Dupriez and Cervantes PSSs. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17407134     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

1.  Prognostication in primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Francisco Cervantes; Arturo Pereira
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Contribution of comorbidities and grade of bone marrow fibrosis to the prognosis of survival in patients with primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Danijela Lekovic; Mirjana Gotic; Maja Perunicic-Jovanovic; Ana Vidovic; Andrija Bogdanovic; Gradimir Jankovic; Vladan Cokic; Natasa Milic
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  One thousand patients with primary myelofibrosis: the mayo clinic experience.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Thitina Jimma; Christy M Finke; Naseema Gangat; Rakhee Vaidya; Kebede H Begna; Aref Al-Kali; Rhett P Ketterling; Curtis A Hanson; Animesh Pardanani
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  Therapeutic potential of Janus-activated kinase-2 inhibitors for the management of myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for myelofibrosis predicts outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bart L Scott; Ted A Gooley; Mohamed L Sorror; Andrew R Rezvani; Michael L Linenberger; Jonathan Grim; Brenda M Sandmaier; David Myerson; Thomas R Chauncey; Rainer Storb; Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch; Jerald P Radich; Frederick R Appelbaum; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Phase 2 study of CEP-701, an orally available JAK2 inhibitor, in patients with primary or post-polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Fabio P S Santos; Hagop M Kantarjian; Nitin Jain; Taghi Manshouri; Deborah A Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Debra Kennedy; Zeev Estrov; Jorge Cortes; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Usefulness of spleen volume measured by computed tomography for predicting clinical outcome in primary myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Moo-Kon Song; Joo-Seop Chung; Sung-Nam Lim; Gyeong-Won Lee; Sang-Min Lee; Nam-Kyung Lee; Jae-Cheol Choi; So-Yeon Oh
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Application of five prognostic survival scores to primary myelofibrosis in 62 Brazilian patients.

Authors:  M C Souza; C A Rodrigues; M R R Silva; J Ribeiro; R Tognon; F A Castro; B P Simões; E X Souto; M L Chauffaille
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  miR-543 regulates the epigenetic landscape of myelofibrosis by targeting TET1 and TET2.

Authors:  Enrique Fuentes-Mattei; Recep Bayraktar; Taghi Manshouri; Andreia M Silva; Cristina Ivan; Diana Gulei; Linda Fabris; Nayra Soares do Amaral; Pilar Mur; Cristina Perez; Elizabeth Torres-Claudio; Mihnea P Dragomir; Adriana Badillo-Perez; Erik Knutsen; Pranav Narayanan; Leonard Golfman; Masayoshi Shimizu; Xinna Zhang; Wanke Zhao; Wanting Tina Ho; Marcos Roberto Estecio; Geoffrey Bartholomeusz; Ciprian Tomuleasa; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe; Patrick A Zweidler-McKay; Zeev Estrov; Zhizhuang J Zhao; Srdan Verstovsek; George A Calin; Roxana S Redis
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-01-16

Review 10.  Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Dae Young Zang; H Joachim Deeg
Journal:  Curr Opin Hematol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.