Literature DB >> 17406947

Factors influencing the volume-outcome relationship in gastrectomies: a population-based study.

David L Smith1, Linda S Elting, Peter A Learn, Chandrajit P Raut, Paul F Mansfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A relationship between hospital procedural volume and patient outcomes has been observed in gastrectomies for primary gastric cancer, but modifiable factors influencing this relationship are not well elaborated.
METHODS: We performed a population-based study of 1864 patients undergoing gastrectomy for primary gastric cancers at 214 hospitals. Hospitals were stratified as high-, intermediate-, or low-volume centers. Multivariate models were constructed to evaluate the effect of institutional procedural volume and other hospital- and patient-specific factors on the risk of in-hospital mortality, adverse events, and failure to rescue, defined as mortality after an adverse event.
RESULTS: High-volume centers attained an in-hospital mortality rate of 1.0% and failure-to-rescue rate of .7%, both less than one-fifth of that seen at intermediate- and low-volume centers, although adverse event rates were similar across the three volume tiers. In multivariate modeling, treatment at a high-volume hospital decreased the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], .22; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], .05-.89), whereas treatment at an institution with a high ratio of licensed vocational nurses per bed increased the odds of mortality (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.04-3.75). Being treated at a hospital with a greater than median number of critical care beds decreased odds of mortality (OR, .46; 95% CI, .25-.81) and failure to rescue (OR, .53; 95% CI, .29-.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Undergoing gastrectomy at a high-volume center is associated with lower in-hospital mortality. However, improving the rates of mortality after adverse events and reevaluating nurse staffing ratios may provide avenues by which lower-volume centers can improve mortality rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17406947     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9381-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  28 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing surgical performance outcomes through process-driven care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Rajesh Aggarwal; Pritam Singh; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Reoperation for early postoperative complications after gastric cancer surgery in a Chinese hospital.

Authors:  Birendra Kumar Sah; Ming-Min Chen; Min Yan; Zheng-Gang Zhu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  An evidence-based review of the surgical treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ugwuji N Maduekwe; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a myth or a reality?

Authors:  Muhammed Ashraf Memon; Breda Memon
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-13

5.  A preoperative nomogram to predict the risk of perioperative mortality following gastric resections for malignancy.

Authors:  Mashaal Dhir; Lynette M Smith; Fred Ullrich; Premila D Leiphrakpam; Quan P Ly; Aaron R Sasson; Chandrakanth Are
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Clinical significance of lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Dezső Tóth; János Plósz; Miklós Török
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02-15

7.  Problems faced by evidence-based medicine in evaluating lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Giuseppe Verlato; Simone Giacopuzzi; Maria Bencivenga; Paolo Morgagni; Giovanni De Manzoni
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Treatment results of curative gastric resection from a specialist Australian unit: low volume with satisfactory outcomes.

Authors:  Iain G Thomson; David C Gotley; Andrew P Barbour; Ian Martin; Neil Jayasuria; Janine Thomas; Bernard M Smithers
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma: A 7-institution study of the U.S. gastric cancer collaborative.

Authors:  Reese W Randle; Douglas S Swords; Edward A Levine; Nora F Fino; Malcolm H Squires; George Poultsides; Ryan C Fields; Mark Bloomston; Sharon M Weber; Timothy M Pawlik; Linda X Jin; Gaya Spolverato; Carl Schmidt; David Worhunsky; Clifford S Cho; Shishir K Maithel; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  In-hospital mortality after stomach cancer surgery in Spain and relationship with hospital volume of interventions.

Authors:  Marisa Baré; Joan Cabrol; Jordi Real; Gemma Navarro; Rafel Campo; Carles Pericay; Antonio Sarría
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.