S Sastry1, K Daly, T Chengodu, C McCollum. 1. Department of Academic Surgery, South Manchester University Hospital, Manchester, UK. cnmcc@manchester.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We investigated the reproducibility of contrast transcranial Doppler (TCD), a safe non-invasive test for investigation of venous-to-arterial circulation shunts (v-aCS), usually patent foramen ovale, in young stroke patients. We also investigated whether microbubble contrast was reproducible and whether the addition of blood to agitated saline contrast affected the number of microbubbles produced. METHODS: TCD investigation for v-aCS was repeated in 42 patients using a standardised protocol (i) by the same investigator and (ii) by a different investigator. Agitated saline was produced by mixing saline and 1 ml of air between two 10-ml syringes. The effect of adding blood and increasing the number of agitations was evaluated by microscopy examination using a haemocytometer to assess bubble numbers and sizes. RESULTS: TCD: no difference was found in the highest microbubble count for the same investigator and between different investigators (p > 0.05). Reproducibility for the detection of v-aCS consistent with a patent foramen ovale was also good (kappa values >0.8). Contrast: both the number of contrast mixes before injection and the presence of blood significantly increased the number of bubbles counted. On average, 18 agitations produced 1.86 (95% CI 1.62-2.13) times more bubbles than 6 agitations. Mixtures with blood produced on average 3.8 times more bubbles (3.08-4.69). The size of the bubbles was similar for all mixtures. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast TCD is reproducible and reliable for the detection of v-aCS. The addition of blood and 18 mixes rather than 6 significantly increased the number of microbubbles produced and may increase the effectiveness of microbubble contrast. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND: We investigated the reproducibility of contrast transcranial Doppler (TCD), a safe non-invasive test for investigation of venous-to-arterial circulation shunts (v-aCS), usually patent foramen ovale, in young strokepatients. We also investigated whether microbubble contrast was reproducible and whether the addition of blood to agitated saline contrast affected the number of microbubbles produced. METHODS:TCD investigation for v-aCS was repeated in 42 patients using a standardised protocol (i) by the same investigator and (ii) by a different investigator. Agitated saline was produced by mixing saline and 1 ml of air between two 10-ml syringes. The effect of adding blood and increasing the number of agitations was evaluated by microscopy examination using a haemocytometer to assess bubble numbers and sizes. RESULTS:TCD: no difference was found in the highest microbubble count for the same investigator and between different investigators (p > 0.05). Reproducibility for the detection of v-aCS consistent with a patent foramen ovale was also good (kappa values >0.8). Contrast: both the number of contrast mixes before injection and the presence of blood significantly increased the number of bubbles counted. On average, 18 agitations produced 1.86 (95% CI 1.62-2.13) times more bubbles than 6 agitations. Mixtures with blood produced on average 3.8 times more bubbles (3.08-4.69). The size of the bubbles was similar for all mixtures. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast TCD is reproducible and reliable for the detection of v-aCS. The addition of blood and 18 mixes rather than 6 significantly increased the number of microbubbles produced and may increase the effectiveness of microbubble contrast. Copyright 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Domenico Consoli; Maurizio Paciaroni; Marco Aguggia; Maurizio Melis; Giovanni Malferrari; Simone Vidale; Paolo Cerrato; Simona Sacco; Carlo Gandolfo; Paolo Bovi; Carlo Serrati; Massimo Del Sette; Anna Cavallini; Marina Diomedi; Paolo Postorino; Stefano Ricci Journal: Neurol Sci Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 3.307
Authors: Mohammad Khalid Mojadidi; Pooya Isaac Bokhoor; Rubine Gevorgyan; Nabil Noureddin; W Cameron MacLellan; Eugenia Wen; Ravi Aysola; Jonathan M Tobis Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2015-11-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Zarrin F Shaikh; Jay Jaye; Neil Ward; Atul Malhotra; Manuel de Villa; Michael I Polkey; Michael J Mullen; Mary J Morrell Journal: Chest Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 9.410