Literature DB >> 17406082

Reactive boundary conditions for stochastic simulations of reaction-diffusion processes.

Radek Erban1, S Jonathan Chapman.   

Abstract

Many cellular and subcellular biological processes can be described in terms of diffusing and chemically reacting species (e.g. enzymes). Such reaction-diffusion processes can be mathematically modelled using either deterministic partial-differential equations or stochastic simulation algorithms. The latter provide a more detailed and precise picture, and several stochastic simulation algorithms have been proposed in recent years. Such models typically give the same description of the reaction-diffusion processes far from the boundary of the simulated domain, but the behaviour close to a reactive boundary (e.g. a membrane with receptors) is unfortunately model-dependent. In this paper, we study four different approaches to stochastic modelling of reaction-diffusion problems and show the correct choice of the boundary condition for each model. The reactive boundary is treated as partially reflective, which means that some molecules hitting the boundary are adsorbed (e.g. bound to the receptor) and some molecules are reflected. The probability that the molecule is adsorbed rather than reflected depends on the reactivity of the boundary (e.g. on the rate constant of the adsorbing chemical reaction and on the number of available receptors), and on the stochastic model used. This dependence is derived for each model.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17406082     DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/4/1/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  31 in total

1.  The two-regime method for optimizing stochastic reaction-diffusion simulations.

Authors:  Mark B Flegg; S Jonathan Chapman; Radek Erban
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Discrete-continuous reaction-diffusion model with mobile point-like sources and sinks.

Authors:  Svyatoslav Kondrat; Olav Zimmermann; Wolfgang Wiechert; Eric von Lieres
Journal:  Eur Phys J E Soft Matter       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 1.890

3.  Electrostatic interactions during Kv1.2 N-type inactivation: random-walk simulation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Małysiak; Zbigniew J Grzywna
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Editorial: special issue on stochastic modelling of reaction-diffusion processes in biology.

Authors:  Radek Erban; Hans G Othmer
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  An accelerated algorithm for discrete stochastic simulation of reaction-diffusion systems using gradient-based diffusion and tau-leaping.

Authors:  Wonryull Koh; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Transport dissipative particle dynamics model for mesoscopic advection-diffusion-reaction problems.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Alireza Yazdani; Alexandre Tartakovsky; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Improved spatial direct method with gradient-based diffusion to retain full diffusive fluctuations.

Authors:  Wonryull Koh; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Stochastic model-assisted development of efficient low-dose viral transduction in microfluidics.

Authors:  Camilla Luni; Federica Michielin; Luisa Barzon; Vincenza Calabrò; Nicola Elvassore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Asynchronous τ-leaping.

Authors:  Zbigniew Jȩdrzejewski-Szmek; Kim T Blackwell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Detailed simulations of cell biology with Smoldyn 2.1.

Authors:  Steven S Andrews; Nathan J Addy; Roger Brent; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.