Literature DB >> 17405821

Written versus oral recommendations made by pharmacy students during internal medicine rotations.

Melanie W Pound1, Susan M Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pharmacy students use a variety of methods to communicate with physicians during clinical rotations regarding pharmacotherapy concerns. Documented acceptance rates for oral or written recommendations, when studied individually, range between 64% and 95%.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the acceptance rates of written versus oral recommendations made by pharmacy students on internal medicine (IM) rotations.
METHODS: Fourth-year pharmacy students completing an IM rotation made oral or written recommendations to physicians at a large, community-based medical center from November 2005 through April 2006 (excluding December). The types of recommendations and outcomes of the interventions were recorded using a data collection form. The primary endpoint was to determine differences in acceptance rates for written versus oral recommendations. Secondary endpoints included comparing the recommendation types and their corresponding acceptance rates. Additionally, the acceptance rates for evidence-based medicine (EBM) interventions were determined.
RESULTS: A total of 625 recommendations were made by 10 pharmacy students during the 5 month study period; 47.5% of these were oral. A total of 82.8% of oral recommendations were accepted compared with 54.2% of written recommendations (p < 0.0001). Over 90% of the total recommendations were drug related. Overall, 68% of these recommendations were accepted. The major types of drug-related recommendations were indication for use (42.7%), inappropriate dose (17.2%), inappropriate route (11.3%), inappropriate drug (8.5%), and duplicate therapy (6.5%). The remaining types of interventions were laboratory related (6.4%) and requests for drug information (3.2%). A total of 227 (36.3%) recommendations were based on EBM guidelines, with an acceptance rate of 67.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy student recommendations are well received by IM physicians. Oral recommendations are accepted at a statistically significantly higher percentage compared with written recommendations. High acceptance rates for recommendations may have the ability to positively impact patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17405821     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1H668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  9 in total

1.  Teaching heart failure treatment guidelines and assessing heart failure therapy.

Authors:  Kathleen A Packard; Thomas L Lenz; Christopher J Destache
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Resident physicians' acceptance of pharmacy students' pharmacotherapy recommendations during an ambulatory care advanced pharmacy practice experience.

Authors:  Lisa M Lundquist; Pamela M Moye
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Impact of pharmacy student interventions in an urban family medicine clinic.

Authors:  Regina Ginzburg
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Student pharmacists' clinical interventions in advanced pharmacy practice experiences at a community nonteaching hospital.

Authors:  Angela O Shogbon; Lisa M Lundquist
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Prescriber Implementation of STOPP/START Recommendations for Hospitalised Older Adults: A Comparison of a Pharmacist Approach and a Physician Approach.

Authors:  Kieran Dalton; Denis O'Mahony; David O'Sullivan; Marie N O'Connor; Stephen Byrne
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Pharmacy student impact on inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressive therapy.

Authors:  Katherine M Carey; Jason E Cross; Matthew A Silva; Mihaela S Stefan; Michael B Rothberg
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Health promotion integrated into a Thai PharmD curriculum to improve pharmacy practice skills.

Authors:  Phayom Sookaneknun; Siritree Suttajit; Chanuttha Ploylearmsang; Juntip Kanjanasilp; Usawadee Maleewong
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Evaluation of pharmacy students' clinical interventions on a general medicine practice experience.

Authors:  Jocelyn D Jones; Sylvia H Jackson; Aisha Gomez; Christie Hollinger; Gayle Rivers
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2011-03-15

9.  Direct phone communication to primary care physician to plan discharge from hospital: feasibility and benefits.

Authors:  Lukas Enzinger; Perrine Dumanoir; Bastien Boussat; Pascal Couturier; Patrice Francois
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.