Literature DB >> 17405192

Evaluation of quality of life in brachial plexus injury patients after reconstructive surgery.

Izuru Kitajima1, Kazureru Doi, Yasunori Hattori, Semih Takka, Emmanuel Estrella.   

Abstract

To evaluate the subjective satisfaction of brachial plexus injury (BPI) patients after surgery based on the medical outcomes study 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) and to correlate their SF-36 scores with upper extremity functions. Four items were assessed statistically for 30 patients: SF-36 scores after BPI surgery were compared with Japanese standard scores; the correlation between SF-36 scores and objective joint functions; difference in SF-36 scores between each type of BPI; and influence of each joint function on the SF-36 scores. The SF-36 subscale: PF--physical functioning, RP--role-physical, BP--bodily pain, and the summary score PCS--physical component summary, were significantly inferior to the Japanese standard scores. SF-36 is more sensitive to shoulder joint function than to elbow and finger joint functions. Little correlation was found between SF-36 scores and objective evaluations of joint functions. Greater effort is needed to improve the quality of life (QOL) of BPI patients. This study showed that SF-36 is not sensitive enough to evaluate regional conditions. A region- or site-specific questionnaire is required to evaluate upper extremity surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17405192     DOI: 10.1142/S0218810406003279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand Surg        ISSN: 0218-8104


  9 in total

1.  Compensation by the Uninjured Arm After Brachial Plexus Injury.

Authors:  Carol A Mancuso; Steve K Lee; Christopher J Dy; Zoe A Landers; Zina Model; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-03

2.  Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury.

Authors:  Christine B Novak; Joel Katz
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  A Population-Based Assessment of Depression and Anxiety in Patients With Brachial Plexus Injuries.

Authors:  Sarah M Yannascoli; Dustin Stwalley; Mohammed J Saeed; Margaret A Olsen; Christopher J Dy
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery.

Authors:  Yirong Wang; Malay Sunitha; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 1.907

5.  Transplantation of human amniotic epithelial cells repairs brachial plexus injury: pathological and biomechanical analyses.

Authors:  Qi Yang; Min Luo; Peng Li; Hai Jin
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 5.135

6.  Penile erectile dysfunction after brachial plexus root avulsion injury in rats.

Authors:  Guo Fu; Bengang Qin; Li Jiang; Xijun Huang; Qinsen Lu; Dechun Zhang; Xiaolin Liu; Jiakai Zhu; Jianwen Zheng; Xuejia Li; Liqiang Gu
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 5.135

7.  An epidemiological study of traumatic brachial plexus injury patients treated at an Indian centre.

Authors:  Darshan Kumar A Jain; Praveen Bhardwaj; Hari Venkataramani; S Raja Sabapathy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-09

8.  Functioning free gracilis transfer to reconstruct elbow flexion and quality of life in global brachial plexus injured patients.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Jian-Tao Yang; Guo Fu; Xiang-Ming Li; Ben-Gang Qin; Yi Hou; Jian Qi; Ping Li; Xiao-Lin Liu; Li-Qiang Gu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Clinical aspects of patients with traumatic lesions of the brachial plexus following surgical treatment.

Authors:  Frederico Barra de Moraes; Mário Yoshihide Kwae; Ricardo Pereira da Silva; Celmo Celeno Porto; Daniel de Paiva Magalhães; Matheus Veloso Paulino
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-09-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.