Literature DB >> 17405078

[Work-site health promotion in Germany. Results of the IAB--establishment panel 2002 and 2004].

A Hollederer1.   

Abstract

According to the answers of employers to the representative IAB establishment panel 2004, one-fifth of the companies in Germany voluntarily carried out or financially supported measures for the protection or promotion of the health and well-being of their work force. The proportion of health-promoting companies was above average in all East German federal states as well as in Bavaria, in Saarland and in Lower Saxony. North Rhine-Westphalia was precisely average. In East Germany, almost one-fourth and in West Germany just under one-fifth of all companies surveyed carry out health-promoting measures.Work-site health promotion varies considerably depending on the corresponding federal states, industrial branches and company sizes. Work-site health promotion has ,up to now, been concentrated in big companies and groups. An under-representation of work-site health promotion is observed above all in small and very small companies and particularly in the catering trade. Work-site health promotion was principally determined by analyses of sickness leaves and surveys on health protection in the work place which were mentioned in about 9% and 8% of the companies interviewed. 6% of the companies provided courses on health-relevant ways of behaviour. About 4% of the companies maintain health circles and 5% realised other health promoting measures. Further correlation analyses reveal that in companies with a workers council/staff council, work-site health promotion was significantly much more common. This correlation is especially strong in small and medium-size companies. The longitudinal analysis of the IAB establishment panel 2002 and 2004 reveals much dynamism in work-site health promotion. On the one hand, half of the companies involved in work-site health promotion in 2002 had stopped their commitment to work-site health promotion by 2004. Sustainability remains one of the biggest challenges in work-site health promotion. On the other hand, a bit more than one tenth of the repeatedly interviewed companies started health-promoting activities in 2004. According to the longitudinal data set, altogether 29% of the companies were reached by work-site health promotion measures (for the years 2002 and 2004).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17405078     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-970599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gesundheitswesen        ISSN: 0941-3790


  6 in total

1.  [Workplace health promotion among elderly employees in Germany. Results in the IAB establishment panel 2011].

Authors:  Alfons Hollederer
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  Prevalence and development of workplace health promotion in Germany: results of the IAB Establishment Panel 2012.

Authors:  Alfons Hollederer; Frank Wießner
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  The Worksite Health Promotion Capacity Instrument (WHPCI): development, validation and approaches for determining companies' levels of health promotion capacity.

Authors:  Julia Jung; Anika Nitzsche; Melanie Neumann; Markus Wirtz; Christoph Kowalski; Jürgen Wasem; Brigitte Stieler-Lorenz; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Health risk factors and self-rated health among job-seekers.

Authors:  Jennis Freyer-Adam; Beate Gaertner; Stefanie Tobschall; Ulrich John
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Patterns and predictors of workplace health promotion: cross-sectional findings from a company survey in Germany.

Authors:  David Beck; Uwe Lenhardt; Britta Schmitt; Sabine Sommer
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Who Should Play a Key Role in Preventing Common Mental Disorders that Affect Employees in the Workplace? Results of a Survey with Occupational Health Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, Psychotherapists, and Human Resource Managers.

Authors:  Martina Michaelis; Elisabeth Maria Balint; Florian Junne; Stephan Zipfel; Harald Gündel; Rahna Lange; Monika A Rieger; Eva Rothermund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.