BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become popular for patients with swallowing disorders as a nutrition support or a decompressant of gastrointestine, perioperative complications associated with PEG have not decreased, especially peristomal infections. To reduce peristomal infections, we designed a new method of gastrostomy by extracorporeal approach under endoscopic observation, named as extra-corporeal PEG (E-PEG). METHODS: Experimental studies for E-PEG were performed repeatedly using pigs under general anesthesia to confirm the safety of its procedure for human use. After approval of institutional ethics review board in our university, thirty patients with prior consent participated in this study. The operation time, the incidence rate of complications and the hospital stay were compared between E-PEG and ordinary pull-method PEG groups. RESULTS: Two patients (6.7%) in E-PEG group had postoperative complications, i.e., aspiration pneumonia and surgical site infection. The operation time of E-PEG group was 5-16 (mean +/- SD: 10.3 +/- 2.96) min as compared to 14-37 (mean +/- SD: 26.9 +/- 8.39) min with pull-method PEG. The postoperative hospital day of E-PEG was within two days except for the two complicated cases. Significance differences of operation time, complication rate and postoperative hospital stay between those groups observed statistically. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that E-PEG was safe, tolerable and speedy when compared ordinary pull-method PEG.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has become popular for patients with swallowing disorders as a nutrition support or a decompressant of gastrointestine, perioperative complications associated with PEG have not decreased, especially peristomal infections. To reduce peristomal infections, we designed a new method of gastrostomy by extracorporeal approach under endoscopic observation, named as extra-corporeal PEG (E-PEG). METHODS: Experimental studies for E-PEG were performed repeatedly using pigs under general anesthesia to confirm the safety of its procedure for human use. After approval of institutional ethics review board in our university, thirty patients with prior consent participated in this study. The operation time, the incidence rate of complications and the hospital stay were compared between E-PEG and ordinary pull-method PEG groups. RESULTS: Two patients (6.7%) in E-PEG group had postoperative complications, i.e., aspiration pneumonia and surgical site infection. The operation time of E-PEG group was 5-16 (mean +/- SD: 10.3 +/- 2.96) min as compared to 14-37 (mean +/- SD: 26.9 +/- 8.39) min with pull-method PEG. The postoperative hospital day of E-PEG was within two days except for the two complicated cases. Significance differences of operation time, complication rate and postoperative hospital stay between those groups observed statistically. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that E-PEG was safe, tolerable and speedy when compared ordinary pull-method PEG.
Authors: I Ahmad; A Mouncher; A Abdoolah; R Stenson; J Wright; A Daniels; J Tillett; A B Hawthorne; G Thomas Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Felipe A Retes; Fabio S Kawaguti; Marcelo S de Lima; Bruno da Costa Martins; Ricardo S Uemura; Gustavo A de Paulo; Caterina Mp Pennacchi; Carla Gusmon; Adriana Vs Ribeiro; Elisa R Baba; Sebastian N Geiger; Mauricio P Sorbello; Marco A Kulcsar; Ulysses Ribeiro; Fauze Maluf-Filho Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Paulo M O Campoli; Daniela M M Cardoso; Marília D Turchi; Flávio H Ejima; Orlando M Mota Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2009-06-26 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Niels Teich; Lars Selig; Susanne Liese; Franziska Schiefke; Alexander Hemprich; Joachim Mössner; Ingolf Schiefke Journal: Endosc Int Open Date: 2018-01-12