Literature DB >> 17404456

Magnetic field perturbation of neural recording and stimulating microelectrodes.

Francisco M Martinez-Santiesteban1, Scott D Swanson, Douglas C Noll, David J Anderson.   

Abstract

To improve the overall temporal and spatial resolution of brain mapping techniques, in animal models, some attempts have been reported to join electrophysiological methods with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, little attention has been paid to the image artefacts produced by the microelectrodes that compromise the anatomical or functional information of those studies. This work presents a group of simulations and MR images that show the limitations of wire microelectrodes and the potential advantages of silicon technology, in terms of image quality, in MRI environments. Magnetic field perturbations are calculated using a Fourier-based method for platinum (Pt) and tungsten (W) microwires as well as two different silicon technologies. We conclude that image artefacts produced by microelectrodes are highly dependent not only on the magnetic susceptibility of the materials used but also on the size, shape and orientation of the electrodes with respect to the main magnetic field. In addition silicon microelectrodes present better MRI characteristics than metallic microelectrodes. However, metallization layers added to silicon materials can adversely affect the quality of MR images. Therefore only those silicon microelectrodes that minimize the amount of metallic material can be considered MR-compatible and therefore suitable for possible simultaneous fMRI and electrophysiological studies. High resolution gradient echo images acquired at 2 T (TR/TE = 100/15 ms, voxel size = 100 x 100 x 100 microm3) of platinum-iridium (Pt-Ir, 90%-10%) and tungsten microwires show a complete signal loss that covers a volume significantly larger than the actual volume occupied by the microelectrodes: roughly 400 times larger for Pt-Ir and 180 for W, at the tip of the microelectrodes. Similar MR images of a single-shank silicon microelectrode only produce a partial volume effect on the voxels occupied by the probe with less than 50% of signal loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17404456     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  MR angiographic evaluation is limited in intracranial aneurysms embolized with Nexus coils.

Authors:  Hyun-Seung Kang; Won-Jin Moon; Hong Gee Roh; Moon Hee Han; Woo Jin Choe; Joon Cho; Chang-Taek Moon; Young Cho Koh
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Influence of propofol and fentanyl on deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.

Authors:  Wonki Kim; In Ho Song; Yong Hoon Lim; Mi-Ryoung Kim; Young Eun Kim; Jae Ha Hwang; In Keyoung Kim; Sang Woo Song; Jin Wook Kim; Woong-Woo Lee; Han-Joon Kim; Cheolyoung Kim; Hee Chan Kim; In Young Kim; Hee Pyoung Park; Dong Gyu Kim; Beom Seok Jeon; Sun Ha Paek
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  MR measurement of alloy magnetic susceptibility: towards developing tissue-susceptibility matched metals.

Authors:  Garrett W Astary; Marcus K Peprah; Charles R Fisher; Rachel L Stewart; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont; Mark W Meisel; Michele V Manuel; Thomas H Mareci
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Electrode position and the clinical outcome after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation.

Authors:  Sun Ha Paek; Jee-Young Lee; Han-Joon Kim; Daehee Kang; Yong Hoon Lim; Mi Ryoung Kim; Cheolyoung Kim; Beom Seok Jeon; Dong Gyu Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus under Sedation with Propofol and Fentanyl.

Authors:  Woong-Woo Lee; Gwanhee Ehm; Hui-Jun Yang; In Ho Song; Yong Hoon Lim; Mi-Ryoung Kim; Young Eun Kim; Jae Ha Hwang; Hye Ran Park; Jae Min Lee; Jin Wook Kim; Han-Joon Kim; Cheolyoung Kim; Hee Chan Kim; Eunkyoung Park; In Young Kim; Dong Gyu Kim; Beomseok Jeon; Sun Ha Paek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.