Literature DB >> 17403805

The twenty to twenty-five-year outcomes of the Harris design-2 matte-finished cemented total hip replacement. A concise follow-up of a previous report.

Michael Skutek1, Robert B Bourne, Cecil H Rorabeck, Alexander Burns, Stephen Kearns, Gajan Krishna.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We previously reported the ten to fifteen-year results for 195 matte-finished Harris Design-2 total hip replacements that had been inserted with cement by two surgeons in 166 patients with osteoarthritis. The purpose of the present report is to update that study and report the twenty to twenty-five-year outcomes. The patients were followed prospectively on the basis of clinical assessment with use of the Harris hip score and radiographic analysis. One hundred and forty-nine patients (90%) had a functioning implant at the time of death or, if living, at twenty to twenty-five years of follow-up. A total of ten patients (ten hips; 5%) underwent a revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (two hips; 1%), the femoral component (four hips; 2%), or both components (four hips; 2%). At twenty-five years, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a survival rate of 83% +/- 6% with revision for any reason as the end point. The survival rate was 86% +/- 6% for the femoral component and 93% +/- 3% for the acetabular component with aseptic loosening as the end point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403805     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Apostolos Dimitroulias; Michael P Bolognesi; Katherine L Hwang; Stuart B Goodman; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Robert B Bourne; Kory D Charron; Keegan Au; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Systematic review of literature of cemented femoral components: what is the durability at minimum 20 years followup?

Authors:  Nicholas A Bedard; John J Callaghan; Michael D Stefl; Steve S Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The John Charnley Award: The functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Martin Lavigne; Marc Therrien; Julie Nantel; Alain Roy; François Prince; Pascal-André Vendittoli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cementless hydroxyapatite coated hip prostheses.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Gabarre; Yolanda Más; Luis Gracia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Fifteen-year results of precoated femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dong Hun Suh; Ho Hyun Yun; Sung Kwang Chun; Won Yong Shon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.