Literature DB >> 17403791

Loss of pin fixation in displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: causes and prevention.

Wudbhav N Sankar1, Nader M Hebela, David L Skaggs, John M Flynn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the results are generally good following pin fixation of supracondylar humeral fractures in children, occasionally there is postoperative displacement. The purposes of the present study were to identify the causes leading to loss of fixation after pin fixation and to present methods for prevention.
METHODS: We evaluated 322 displaced supracondylar humeral fractures that had been treated with percutaneous pin fixation. We examined fracture classification, pin configuration, intraoperative alignment after fixation, change in alignment after fixation, details of additional procedures, and final radiographic and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Adequate radiographs were available for 279 of the 322 fractures. Eight (2.9%) of the 279 fractures were associated with postoperative loss of fixation; all eight were Gartland type-III fractures. Seven of these eight fractures initially had been treated with two lateral-entry pins, and one had been treated with two crossed pins. In patients with Gartland type-III fractures, loss of fixation was successfully avoided more often when three pins were used (with fixation being maintained in thirty-seven of thirty-seven patients) as opposed to when two lateral-entry pins were used (with fixation being maintained in thirty-five of forty-two patients) (p = 0.01). In all cases, loss of fixation was due to technical errors that were identifiable on the intraoperative fluoroscopic images and that could have been prevented with proper technique. We identified three types of pin-fixation errors: (1) failure to engage both fragments with two pins or more, (2) failure to achieve bicortical fixation with two pins or more, and (3) failure to achieve adequate pin separation (>2 mm) at the fracture site.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative displacement following pin fixation of supracondylar humeral fractures in children is uncommon. In the present series, loss of fixation was most likely to occur when Gartland type-III fractures were treated with two lateral-entry pins. There were no failures when three pins were used. In all cases of failure, there were identifiable technical errors in pin placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17403791     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

Review 1.  Supracondylar humeral fractures in children: current concepts for management and prognosis.

Authors:  Jaime Zorrilla S de Neira; Alfonso Prada-Cañizares; Rafael Marti-Ciruelos; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Is lateral pin fixation for displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus better than crossed pins in children?

Authors:  Jia-Guo Zhao; Jia Wang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Forty-five-degree or higher insertion angles are required to penetrate the opposite cortex in bicortical applications of Kirschner wires: an in vitro study on sheep bones.

Authors:  Mehmet Colak; Burak Gurer; Mehmet Ali Sungur; Metin Manouchehr Eskandari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Supracondylar humerus fractures in children treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning.

Authors:  Michelangelo Scaglione; Daniele Giovannelli; Luca Fabbri; Dario Dell'omo; Andrea Goffi; Giulio Guido
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-07-22

5.  The role of lateral-entry Steinmann pins in the treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  Jacob Weinberg; Mohan V Belthur
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: effect of bone-implant interface conditions on fracture stability.

Authors:  Ron Lamdan; Meir Liebergall; Amit Gefen; Naum Symanovsky; Eran Peleg
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 1.548

7.  [Radial external fixator for closed treatment of type III and IV supracondylar humerus fractures in children. A new surgical technique].

Authors:  T Slongo
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  Treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children by humero-ulnar external fixation.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bogdan; Jean Quintin; Frédéric Schuind
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Operative management of type III extension supracondylar fractures in children.

Authors:  Cemal Kazimoglu; Murat Cetin; Muhittin Sener; Haluk Aguş; Onder Kalanderer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  A retrospective analysis of loss of reduction in operated supracondylar humerus fractures.

Authors:  Balasubramanian Balakumar; Vrisha Madhuri
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.