Literature DB >> 17402300

The effect of presentation level on the Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test.

Jeffrey A Weihing1, Frank E Musiek, Jennifer Brooke Shinn.   

Abstract

The Gaps-In-Noise (GIN) test is a new procedure used in the diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders. Performance on the GIN is recorded as approximate gap detection threshold and percent correct. In order to utilize the GIN test clinically, it is important to know how presentation level influences performance on the GIN. To this end, ten normal-hearing adults were administered the GIN at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 50 dB SL with regard to threshold to GIN noise. Results indicated that performance for both the approximate gap detection threshold (A.th) and percent correct improved with increasing presentation level. Performance at 35 dB SL was not significantly different from the standard clinical presentation level (50 dB SL). Gaps that were between 5 and 8 msec in duration tended to show more variation across presentation levels. Although an influence of presentation level was noted, this influence should not be manifested at the standard clinical presentation level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17402300     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.18.2.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  8 in total

1.  Auditory impairments in HIV-infected individuals in Tanzania.

Authors:  Isaac I Maro; Ndeserua Moshi; Odile H Clavier; Todd A MacKenzie; Robert J Kline-Schoder; Jed C Wilbur; Robert D Chambers; Abigail M Fellows; Benjamin G Jastrzembski; John E Mascari; Muhammad Bakari; Mecky Matee; Frank E Musiek; Richard D Waddell; C Fordham von Reyn; Jay C Buckey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Comparison of Clinical and Traditional Gap Detection Tests.

Authors:  Eric Hoover; Lauren Pasquesi; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Temporal resolution in individuals with neurological disorders.

Authors:  Camila Maia Rabelo; Jeffrey A Weihing; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.365

4.  Central auditory processing and migraine: a controlled study.

Authors:  Larissa Mendonça Agessi; Thaís Rodrigues Villa; Karin Ziliotto Dias; Deusvenir de Souza Carvalho; Liliane Desgualdo Pereira
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  The effects of unilateral tinnitus on auditory temporal resolution: gaps-in-noise performance.

Authors:  Yong-Hwi An; So Young Jin; Sang Won Yoon; Hyun Joon Shim
Journal:  Korean J Audiol       Date:  2014-12-22

6.  Acoustic stimulation effect on temporal processing skills in elderly subjects before and after hearing aid fitting.

Authors:  Maria Madalena Canina Pinheiro; Karin Ziliotto Dias; Liliane Desgualdo Pereira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug

7.  Temporal processing in postlingual adult users of cochlear implant.

Authors:  Maycon Duarte; Amanda Dal Piva Gresele; Maria Madalena Canina Pinheiro
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-11-06

8.  Effect of conductive hearing loss on central auditory function.

Authors:  Arash Bayat; Mohammad Farhadi; Hesam Emamdjomeh; Nader Saki; Golshan Mirmomeni; Fakher Rahim
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.