Literature DB >> 17401691

Comparing perceived and objectively measured access to recreational facilities as predictors of physical activity in adolescent girls.

Molly M Scott1, Kelly R Evenson, Deborah A Cohen, Christine E Cox.   

Abstract

A number of studies in recent years have identified both self-report and objectively measured accessibility of recreational facilities as important predictors of physical activity in youth. Yet, few studies have: (1) examined the relationship between the number and proximity of objectively measured neighborhood physical activity facilities and respondents' perceptions and (2) compared objective and self-report measures as predictors of physical activity. This study uses data on 1,367 6th-grade girls who participated in the Trial of Activity for Adolescent Girls (TAAG) to explore these issues. Girls reported whether nine different types of recreational facilities were easily accessible. These facilities included basketball courts, golf courses, martial arts studios, playing fields, tracks, skating rinks, swimming pools, tennis courts, and dance/gymnastic clubs. Next, geographic information systems (GIS) were used to identify all the parks, schools, and commercial sites for physical activity located within a mile of each girl's home. These sites were then visited to inventory the types of facilities available. Girls wore accelerometers to measure their weekly minutes of non-school metabolic equivalent weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MW-MVPA). The number of facilities within a half-mile of girls' homes strongly predicted the perception of easy access to seven out of nine facility types. Both individual facility perceptions and the total number of facilities perceived were associated with increased physical activity. For each additional facility perceived, girls clocked 3% more metabolic equivalent weighted moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (p < 0.001). Although girls tended to record 3% more of this kind of physical activity (p < 0.05) per basketball court within a mile of their homes, objective facility measures were otherwise unrelated to physical activity. The results from this study suggest that raising the profile of existing facilities may help increase physical activity among adolescent girls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401691      PMCID: PMC2231830          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-007-9179-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  16 in total

1.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children.

Authors:  Maurice R Puyau; Anne L Adolph; Firoz A Vohra; Nancy F Butte
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2002-03

2.  Environmental measures of physical activity supports: perception versus reality.

Authors:  Karen A Kirtland; Dwayne E Porter; Cheryl L Addy; Matthew J Neet; Joel E Williams; Patricia A Sharpe; Linda J Neff; C Dexter Kimsey; Barbara E Ainsworth
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Assessing the perceived environment among minimally active adolescent girls: validity and relations to physical activity outcomes.

Authors:  Genevieve Fridlund Dunton; Margaret Schneider Jamner; Dan Michael Cooper
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

4.  Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls.

Authors:  Margarita S Treuth; Kathryn Schmitz; Diane J Catellier; Robert G McMurray; David M Murray; M Joao Almeida; Scott Going; James E Norman; Russell Pate
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Community agency survey formative research results from the TAAG study.

Authors:  Ruth P Saunders; Jamie Moody
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2006-02

6.  Measuring the influence of built neighborhood environments on walking in older adults.

Authors:  Yvonne Michael; Tracey Beard; Dongseok Choi; Stephanie Farquhar; Nichole Carlson
Journal:  J Aging Phys Act       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.961

7.  Design of the Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG).

Authors:  June Stevens; David M Murray; Diane J Catellier; Peter J Hannan; Leslie A Lytle; John P Elder; Deborah R Young; Denise G Simons-Morton; Larry S Webber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Perceptions about the local neighborhood and walking and cycling among children.

Authors:  Anna Timperio; David Crawford; Amanda Telford; Jo Salmon
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Association between physical activity and proximity to physical activity resources among low-income, midlife women.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jilcott; Kelly R Evenson; Barbara A Laraia; Alice S Ammerman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Girls' perception of physical environmental factors and transportation: reliability and association with physical activity and active transport to school.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Amanda S Birnbaum; Ariane L Bedimo-Rung; James F Sallis; Carolyn C Voorhees; Kimberly Ring; John P Elder
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 6.457

View more
  37 in total

1.  Places to play: association of park space and facilities with healthy weight status among children.

Authors:  Luke R Potwarka; Andrew T Kaczynski; Andrea L Flack
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-10

2.  The neighborhood recreational environment and physical activity among urban youth: an examination of public and private recreational facilities.

Authors:  Amy V Ries; Alice F Yan; Carolyn C Voorhees
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

3.  Out and about: association of the built environment with physical activity behaviors of adolescent females.

Authors:  Daniel A Rodríguez; Gi-Hyoug Cho; Kelly R Evenson; Terry L Conway; Deborah Cohen; Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar; Julie L Pickrel; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Leslie A Lytle
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 4.078

4.  Assessing residential exposure to urban noise using environmental models: does the size of the local living neighborhood matter?

Authors:  Quentin M Tenailleau; Nadine Bernard; Sophie Pujol; Hélène Houot; Daniel Joly; Frédéric Mauny
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Youth physical activity resource use and activity measured by accelerometry.

Authors:  Andréa L Maslow; Natalie Colabianchi
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr

6.  Construct validity of selected measures of physical activity beliefs and motives in fifth and sixth grade boys and girls.

Authors:  Rod K Dishman; Ruth P Saunders; Kerry L McIver; Marsha Dowda; Russell R Pate
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2013-03-04

7.  What is my walking neighbourhood? A pilot study of English adults' definitions of their local walking neighbourhoods.

Authors:  Graham Smith; Christopher Gidlow; Rachel Davey; Charles Foster
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Christine M Hoehner; Kristen Day; Ann Forsyth; James F Sallis
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Multilevel correlates of physical activity for early, mid, and late adolescent girls.

Authors:  Deborah Young; Brit I Saksvig; Tong Tong Wu; Kathleen Zook; Xia Li; Steven Champaloux; Mira Grieser; Sunmin Lee; Margarita S Treuth
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2013-05-13

10.  Objective and perceived availability of physical activity opportunities: differences in associations with physical activity behavior among urban adolescents.

Authors:  Richard G Prins; Anke Oenema; Klazine van der Horst; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.