Literature DB >> 17400943

Women's smoking history prior to entering the US Navy: a prospective predictor of performance.

Terry L Conway1, Susan I Woodruff, Linda K Hervig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether women's tobacco use prior to entering the US Navy is predictive of subsequent career performance. A priori predictions were that smoking at entry into the Navy would be related to early attrition, poorer job performance, more disciplinary problems and lower likelihood of re-enlistment.
METHODS: A prospective cohort analysis of 5487 women entering the US Navy between March 1996 and March 1997 was conducted. Navy attrition/retention and career performance measures, such as time in service, early attrition, type of discharge, misconduct, number of promotions, demotions and unauthorised absences, highest paygrade achieved, and re-enlistment were examined.
RESULTS: Compared with never smokers, daily smokers at entry into the US Navy had subsequent career outcomes consistently indicating poorer job performance (eg, early attrition prior to serving a full-term enlistment, more likely to have a less-than-honourable discharge, more demotions and desertions, lower achieved paygrade and less likely to re-enlist). Other types of smokers consistently fell between never and daily smokers on career outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: For women entering the US Navy, being a daily smoker is a prospective predictor of poorer performance in the Navy. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of cessation intervention with smoker-enlistees prior to their entering the Navy, to assess the impact on subsequent career outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17400943      PMCID: PMC2598487          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2006.016436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  24 in total

Review 1.  Medical costs of smoking in the United States: estimates, their validity, and their implications.

Authors:  K E Warner; T A Hodgson; C E Carroll
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The association of smoking and the cost of military training.

Authors:  R C Klesges; C K Haddock; C F Chang; G W Talcott; H A Lando
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Annual smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs--United States, 1995-1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of estimated genetic and environmental effects on smoking behavior in male and female adult twins.

Authors:  Ming D Li; Rong Cheng; Jennie Z Ma; Gary E Swan
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  Career History Archival Medical and Personnel System.

Authors:  E K Eric Gunderson; Cedric F Garland; Milan R Miller; Edward D Gorham
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  The impact of a total ban on smoking in the Johns Hopkins Children's Center.

Authors:  D M Becker; H F Conner; H R Waranch; F Stillman; L Pennington; P S Lees; F Oski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Smoking and physical fitness among Navy shipboard men.

Authors:  T L Conway; T A Cronan
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Tobacco use and performance on the U.S. Army Physical Fitness Test.

Authors:  M S Bahrke; T S Baur; D F Poland; D F Connors
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Operation Stay Quit: evaluation of two smoking relapse prevention strategies for women after involuntary cessation during US Navy recruit training.

Authors:  Terry L Conway; Susan I Woodruff; Christine C Edwards; John P Elder; Suzanne L Hurtado; Linda K Hervig
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 10.  Health hazards of passive smoking.

Authors:  M P Eriksen; C A LeMaistre; G R Newell
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 21.981

View more
  1 in total

1.  Bias from using occupational smoking prevalence to adjust occupational incidence cohort lung cancer mortality rates.

Authors:  David C Deubner; H Daniel Roth
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.162

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.